Events in Iran and Iraq led to another round of crude oil price increases in 1979 and 1980. The Iranian revolution resulted in the loss of 2 to 2.5 million barrels per day of oil production between November, 1978 and June, 1979. At one point production almost halted.

While the Iranian revolution was the proximate cause of what would be the highest prices in post-WWII history, its impact on prices would have been limited and of relatively short duration had it not been for subsequent events. Shortly after the revolution production was up to 4 million barrels per day.

Iran weakened by the revolution was invaded by Iraq in September, 1980. By November the combined production of both countries was only a million barrels per day and 6.5 million barrels per day less than a year before. As a consequence worldwide crude oil production was 10 percent lower than in 1979.

The combination of the Iranian revolution and the Iraq-Iran War cause crude oil prices to more than double increasing from from $14 in 1978 to $35 per barrel in 1981.

Twenty-six years later Iran's production is only two-thirds of the level reached under the government of Reza Pahlavi, the former Shah of Iran.

Iraq's production remains about 1.5 million barrels below its peak before the Iraq-Iran War.

But on August 7, 1991, Bakhtiar was murdered by three assassins along with his secretary, Soroush Katibeh, in his home.

Iran demonstrated its suspicion about the source of the leaks, when it arrested Hans Buehler, a top salesman for Crypto AG, in Teheran on March 18, 1992.

Sandia National Laboratories: James Gosler, Gus Simmons and the COVERT CHANNEL.

The covert channel idea is to clandestinely transmit a crypto key with the cipher text so that any listener with knowledge of the location of the crypto key is can read the cipher text. There are lots of ways to hide information in noise. And, of course, the transmitter thinks secure messages are being sent.

Hans Buehler investigates on his release from the Evin prison in Tehran.

Lieutenant General Terry Walter Gabreski

EDUCATION

1973 Bachelor of Arts degree in history, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge
1977 Squadron Officer School, Maxwell AFB, Ala.
1978 Master's degree in public administration, Golden Gate University
1985 U.S. Army Command and General Staff College, Fort Leavenworth, Kan.
1991 Air War College, Maxwell AFB, Ala.
1993 Massachusetts Institute of Technology Fellow, Washington, D.C.
1994 Executive Program for Senior Officials in National Security, John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, Cambridge, Mass.
1997 Defense Systems Management College, Fort Belvoir, Va.
2002 The General Manager Program, Harvard Business School, Cambridge, Mass.

Effective dates of promotions

Second Lieutenant Sept. 10, 1974
First Lieutenant Sept. 10, 1976
Captain Sept. 10, 1978
Major Aug. 1, 1984
Lieutenant Colonel July 1, 1988
Colonel Dec. 1, 1992
Brigadier General March 1, 1999
Major General Dec. 1, 2002
Lieutenant General Aug. 1, 2005

She is the daughter of retired, Air Force Brigadier General Alonzo Walter and the daughter-in-law of Colonel Gabby Gabreski.

Gabreski is now sitting one valid genocide and two other criminal complaint affidavits. Which her subordinates didn't properly process. This is a title 18 felony violation of law as well a a violation of oath of officer.

They used to get away with nonsense. Before Internet.

Let's see what Gabreski does ... and her staff too.

And see what we do too.

We received your letters dated 24 July 2007, 8 August 2007, and 6 September 2007 addressed to Colonel Terrence A. Feehan, the Nuclear Weapons Center Commander, to take action regarding Title 18 felony violations by New Mexico, Wyoming, and Utah judges.

Here are links to those letters.

1 http://www.prosefights.org/nmlegal/dcvoid/dcvoid.htm#feehan1
2 http://www.prosefights.org/nmlegal/dcvoid/dcvoid.htm#feehan2
3 http://www.prosefights.org/nmlegal/dcvoid/dcvoid.htm#feehan3

Our first concern is to find a safe harbor from these renegade New Mexico judges who seeking malicious and unwarranted sanctions to prevent us from seeking and proving truth and justice.

You failed to mention criminal complaint affidavits, with all evidence of guilt in writing, filed against New Mexico federal judge M Christina Armijo and magistrate Lorenzo F Garcia.

To ensure proper disposition of your concerns, we have forwarded all three letters, the criminal complaint affidavit, and Civil No. 97-266 MCA/LFG to the Civil Chief at the US Attorney's Office in Albuquerque, NM for action.

We believe that your forwarding all three letters, and criminal complaint affidavits it the civil chief at the US Attorney's office in Albuquerque is an inappropriate action on Colonel Feehan's and your part.

In doing so you and Colonel Feehan may appear to be involved in an attempted cover-up of an alleged felony crime.

This in not in line with your oath of office as Air as Air Force officers bound to uphold the US Constitution and Title 18 § 4.

Misprision of felony Whoever, having knowledge of the actual commission of a felony cognizable by a court of the United States, conceals and does not as soon as possible make known the same to some judge or other person in civil or military authority under the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both.

You and Colonel Feehan attempt to defeat safeguards built into the US Constitution to defeat corruption within the legal system by not doing your jobs.

Named criminals judge Armijo and Garcia along with US Attorney's office threaten us instead of properly ruling on motion to vacate judgment and strike from docket criminal complaint against Brzezinski.

As you can see the accused judges have assigned the US Attorney's office to collect exorbitant fines from plaintiffs. This violates plaintiff due process by not ruling on plaintiffs' motion but blatantly retaliating with large fines and possible incarceration.

You due under the law is provide us a safe harbor from these renegade judges until due process an untainted authorities can intervene.

This is serious business.

Nojeh Coup

In July 1980, Zbigniew Brzezinski of the United States met Jordan's King Hussein in Amman to discuss detailed plans for Saddam Hussein to sponsor a coup in Iran against Khomeini. King Hussein was Saddam's closest confidant in the Arab world, and served as an intermediary during the planning. The Iraqi invasion of Iran would be launched under the pretext of a call for aid from Iranian loyalist officers plotting their own uprising on July 9, 1980 (codenamed Nojeh, after Shahrokhi/Nojeh air base in Hamedan). The Iranian officers were organized by Shapour Bakhtiar, who had fled to France when Khomeini seized power, but was operating from Baghdad and Sulimaniyah at the time of Brzezinski's meeting with Hussein. However, Khomeini learned of the Nojeh Coup plan from Soviet agents in France and Latin America. Shortly after Brzezinski's meeting with Hussein, the President of Iran, Abolhassan Bani-Sadr quietly rounded up 600 of the loyalist plotters within Iran, putting an effective end to the Nojeh Coup.[5] Saddam decided to invade without the Iranian officers' assistance, beginning the Iran-Iraq war on 22 September 1980.

because

In The Longest War: The Iran-Iraq Military Conflict by Dilip Hiro states on the cover text,

How was Iraq - at a 3 to 1 disadvantage in population - able to sustain an eight year war and arm one-tenth of its entire population? ... It had been a bloody and expensive conflict. Conservative Western estimate put the total number of war dead at 367,000 - Iran accounting for 262,000 and Iraq 105,000. With more than 70,000 injured, the total casualties were put at over million. The official figures, given a month later by minister of Islamic guidance in a radio interview, put the Iranian dead at 123,220 combatants, and another 60,711 missing in action. In addition 11,000 civilians had lost their lives. Tehran's total of nearly 200,000 troops and civilians killed was in stark contrast to Bagdad's estimate of 800,000 Iranian dead." page 250.

You wrote

I am sure that the US Attorney's Office will be best suited to address the issues you presented in your letters. In the future, please provide issues of this nature directly to the US Attorney's office.

Dear Mr. Payne

We received your letters dated 24 July 2007, 8 August 2007, and 6 September 2007 addressed to Colonel Terrence A. Feehan, the Nuclear Weapons Center Commander, to take action regarding Title 18 felony violations by New Mexico, Wyoming, and Utah judges. To ensure proper disposition of your concerns, we have forwarded all three letters, the criminal complaint affidavit, and Civil No. 97-266 MCA/LFG to the Civil Chief at the US Attorney's Office in Albuquerque, NM for action.

I am sure that the US Attorney's Office will be best suited to address the issues you presented in your letters. In the future, please provide issues of this nature directly to the US Attorney's office.

Sincerely,

TISHLYN E. TAYLOR

We received your letters dated 24 July 2007, 8 August 2007, and 6 September 2007 addressed to Colonel Terrence A. Feehan, the Nuclear Weapons Center Commander, to take action regarding Title 18 felony violations by New Mexico, Wyoming, and Utah judges.

appears to be partially incorrect. We do not believe we references Wyoming and Utah judges.

Here are links to those letters.

1 http://www.prosefights.org/nmlegal/dcvoid/dcvoid.htm#feehan1
2 http://www.prosefights.org/nmlegal/dcvoid/dcvoid.htm#feehan2
3 http://www.prosefights.org/nmlegal/dcvoid/dcvoid.htm#feehan3

You failed to mention criminal complaint affidavits, with all evidence of guilt in writing, filed against New Mexico federal judge M Christina Armijo and magistrate Lorenzo F Garcia.

To ensure proper disposition of your concerns, we have forwarded all three letters, the criminal complaint affidavit, and Civil No. 97-266 MCA/LFG to the Civil Chief at the US Attorney's Office in Albuquerque, NM for action.

We believe that your forwarding all three letters, and criminal complaint affidavits it the civil chief at the US Attorney's office in Albuquerque is an inappropriate action on Colonel Feehan's and your part.

You and Colonel Feehan appear to be involved in an attempted cover-up of an alleged felony crime.

This in not in line with your oath of office as Air as Air Force officers bound to uphold the US Constitution and Title 18 § 4.

Misprision of felony Whoever, having knowledge of the actual commission of a felony cognizable by a court of the United States, conceals and does not as soon as possible make known the same to some judge or other person in civil or military authority under the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both.

You and Colonel Feehan attempt to defeat safeguards built into the US Constitution to defeat corruption within the legal system by not doing your jobs.

Named criminals judge Armijo and Garcia along with US Attorney's office threaten us instead of properly ruling on motion to vacate judgment and strike from docket criminal complaint against Brzezinski.

This is serious business.

Nojeh Coup

In July 1980, Zbigniew Brzezinski of the United States met Jordan's King Hussein in Amman to discuss detailed plans for Saddam Hussein to sponsor a coup in Iran against Khomeini. King Hussein was Saddam's closest confidant in the Arab world, and served as an intermediary during the planning. The Iraqi invasion of Iran would be launched under the pretext of a call for aid from Iranian loyalist officers plotting their own uprising on July 9, 1980 (codenamed Nojeh, after Shahrokhi/Nojeh air base in Hamedan). The Iranian officers were organized by Shapour Bakhtiar, who had fled to France when Khomeini seized power, but was operating from Baghdad and Sulimaniyah at the time of Brzezinski's meeting with Hussein. However, Khomeini learned of the Nojeh Coup plan from Soviet agents in France and Latin America. Shortly after Brzezinski's meeting with Hussein, the President of Iran, Abolhassan Bani-Sadr quietly rounded up 600 of the loyalist plotters within Iran, putting an effective end to the Nojeh Coup.[5] Saddam decided to invade without the Iranian officers' assistance, beginning the Iran-Iraq war on 22 September 1980.

because

In The Longest War: The Iran-Iraq Military Conflict by Dilip Hiro states on the cover text,

How was Iraq - at a 3 to 1 disadvantage in population - able to sustain an eight year war and arm one-tenth of its entire population? ... It had been a bloody and expensive conflict. Conservative Western estimate put the total number of war dead at 367,000 - Iran accounting for 262,000 and Iraq 105,000. With more than 70,000 injured, the total casualties were put at over million. The official figures, given a month later by minister of Islamic guidance in a radio interview, put the Iranian dead at 123,220 combatants, and another 60,711 missing in action. In addition 11,000 civilians had lost their lives. Tehran's total of nearly 200,000 troops and civilians killed was in stark contrast to Bagdad's estimate of 800,000 Iranian dead." page 250.

You wrote

I am sure that the US Attorney's Office will be best suited to address the issues you presented in your letters. In the future, please provide issues of this nature directly to the US Attorney's office.

Dear Mr. Payne

We received your letters dated 24 July 2007, 8 August 2007, and 6 September 2007 addressed to Colonel Terrence A. Feehan, the Nuclear Weapons Center Commander, to take action regarding Title 18 felony violations by New Mexico, Wyoming, and Utah judges. To ensure proper disposition of your concerns, we have forwarded all three letters, the criminal complaint affidavit, and Civil No. 97-266 MCA/LFG to the Civil Chief at the US Attorney's Office in Albuquerque, NM for action.

I am sure that the US Attorney's Office will be best suited to address the issues you presented in your letters. In the future, please provide issues of this nature directly to the US Attorney's office.

Sincerely,

TISHLYN E. TAYLOR

Each clerk of court and his deputies shall take the following oath or affirmation before entering upon their duties: “I, XXX XXX, having been appointed XXX, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will truly and faithfully enter and record all orders, decrees, judgments and proceedings of such court, and will faithfully and impartially discharge all other duties of my office according to the best of my abilities and understanding. So help me God.”

From: A...
To: bill payne
Sent: Wednesday, September 05, 2007 5:15 PM
Subject: RE: What's your next move

Good luck, I hope you encounter someone honest enough to do the right thing.

We're in big trouble if the US attacks Iran. I wish I could say the authorities would never do something so stupid, but that would be putting too much faith in the existence of intelligent life within leadership circles.

I think positions of authority may require about 100 IQ brain power dump.

A....

Email from Vancouver, BC.

----- Original Message -----
From: A ...
To: bill payne
Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2007 10:57 PM
Subject: RE: vancouver island in background

Looks like you're not having the best round of news. What's your next move? Incompetent criminals can be very dangerous to your well being. - A

Thursday September 6, 2007 06:03

Certified return receipt requested

http://www.prosefights.org/nmlegal/dcvoid/dcvoid.htm#feehan3

Col. Terrence A. Feehan, Commander
Nuclear Weapons Center
2000 Wyoming Bvld SE
KAFB, NM 87117

Dear Col. Feehan:

Judge M Christina Armijo committed two Title 18 felony violations of law in writing is court record in 97 cv 266.

You are assigned the task of seeing that the Armijo criminal complaint is properly processed as authorized under Title 18 § 4.

Misprision of felony Whoever, having knowledge of the actual commission of a felony cognizable by a court of the United States, conceals and does not as soon as possible make known the same to some judge or other person in civil or military authority under the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both.

You are the nearest military authority.

06/12/2007 85 STRICKEN from the record pursuant to 100 Order - REPLY to Response to Motion re 81 MOTION to Set Aside Judgment filed by William H Payne, Arthur R Morales. (pz) Modified docket text on 8/28/2007 (ln). (Entered: 06/12/2007)

08/27/2007 100 ORDER by Judge M. Christina Armijo Adopting Report and Recommendations, Striking Pleadings, and Imposing Sanctions 95 (jab) (Entered: 08/27/2007)

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court will accept no further filings from Plaintiffs in this case, save for a notice of appeal, other than the payments ordered above.

Docket entry 85 "REPLY to Response to Motion re 81 MOTION to Set Aside Judgment filed by William H Payne, Arthur R Morales. (pz) (Entered: 06/12/2007)" in section 15 contains the criminal complaint affidavit

is now your responsiblity to see that it is properly processed, investigated, and disposed of.

We speculate this

Failure to not do your job is, of course, a violation of your oath of office as an Air Force officer.

We ask that you send us the address and phone number of your commanding officer General Gabreski at Wright Patterson AFB.

We ask that you respond to us in writing by Wednesday September 12, 2007.

Sincerely,


William H. Payne
13015 Calle de Sandias NE
Albuquerque, NM 87111
bpayne37@comcast.net


Arthur R. Morales
465 Washington St SE
Albuquerque, NM 87108
amorales58@comcast.net

distribution

U.S. House of Representative Committee on the Judiciary
United States Senate Committee on the Judiciary

http://www.prosefights.org/nmlegal/dcvoid/dcvoid.htm#feehan2

Let's see what Feehan and the Air Force does.

Mental health, competency, and educational issues should be of concern to the opposition.

Looks like a rather large group of mentally ill have gotten together ... led, of course, by James Gosler.

On information and belief the INTEL which resulted in the below paragraph

Failed Nojeh Coup In July 1980, the U.S. national security adviser Zbigniew Brzezinski met Jordan's King Hussein in Amman to discuss detailed plans for Saddam Hussein to sponsor a coup in Iran against Khomeini. King Hussein was Saddam's closest confidant in the Arab world, and served as an intermediary during the planning. The Iraqi invasion of Iran would be launched under the pretext of a call for aid from Iranian loyalist officers plotting their own uprising on July 9, 1980 (codenamed Nojeh, after Shahrokhi/Nojeh air base in Hamedan). The Iranian officers were organized by Shapour Bakhtiar, who had fled to France when Khomeini seized power, but was operating from Baghdad and Sulimaniyah at the time of Brzezinski's meeting with Hussein. However, Khomeini learned of the Nojeh Coup plan from Soviet agents in France, Pakistan, and Latin America. Shortly after Brzezinski's meeting with Hussein, the President of Iran, Abolhassan Bani-Sadr quietly rounded up six hundred officers and executed many of them, putting an effective end to the Nojeh Coup [2]. Saddam would decide to invade without the Iranian officer's assistance, beginning the Iran-Iraq war on 22 September 1980.

was collected by Persian intelligence.

Claiming that Brzezinski is innocent may not be a good idea.

Wednesday August 8, 2007 10:15

Certified return receipt requested

http://www.prosefights.org/nmlegal/dcvoid/dcvoid.htm#feehan2

Col. Terrence A. Feehan, Commander
Nuclear Weapons Center
2000 Wyoming Bvld SE
KAFB, NM 87117

Dear Col. Feehan:

New Mexico chief magistrate judge Lorenzo Garcia appears to have committed another Title 18 felony violation of law in writing in court records in a REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS FOR SANCTION AND STRIKING OF DOCUMENTS file stamped July 31, 2007. See docket entry 95.

In addition, Garcia falsely accuses us of

The Court’s Order to Show Cause required a written response and supporting affidavits no later than July 25, 2007. Neither Payne nor Morales complied with the Court’s directive. Neither filed a response to the Order to Show Cause, nor did they offer any rationale why the pleadings should not be stricken or denied, or why they should not be sanctioned for their abusive litigation practices. Neither Plaintiff sought any extension of time within which to comply with the Court’s order.

because docket entry numbers 93 and 94 show that we responded on time.

Garcia violated due process by not allowing judge M Christina Armijo to rule on our MOTION TO VOID ORDER OF REFERENCE FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION and accompanying MANDATORY JUDICIAL NOTICE AND AUTHORITIES TO VOID ORDER OF REFERENCE FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION which was a response to Garcia and mailed on 07/25/2007 03:43:28 PM in compliance with Rule 5(b)(2)(B).

We enclose a hardcopy of Garcia's REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION for Sanctions and Striking of Documents.

Electronic copies are posted at http://www.prosefights.org/nmlegal/nsalawsuit/nsalawsuit.htm#garciasanctions and in pdf at http://www.prosefights.org/nmlegal/nsalawsuit/pacerdockeaugust62007/garciathreats.pdf

Garcia's report was written as a result of a Order of Reference written by judge M Christina Armijo.

Armijo wrote

Judge Garcia shall issue his Report and Recommendation to the Court in accord with the requirements of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1).

28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) states

§ 636. Jurisdiction, powers, and temporary assignment

(b)

(1) Notwithstanding any provision of law to the contrary—

(A) a judge may designate a magistrate judge to hear and determine any pretrial matter pending before the court, except a motion for injunctive relief, for judgment on the pleadings, for summary judgment, to dismiss or quash an indictment or information made by the defendant, to suppress evidence in a criminal case, to dismiss or to permit maintenance of a class action, to dismiss for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted, and to involuntarily dismiss an action. A judge of the court may reconsider any pretrial matter under this subparagraph (A) where it has been shown that the magistrate judge’s order is clearly erroneous or contrary to law.

(B) a judge may also designate a magistrate judge to conduct hearings, including evidentiary hearings, and to submit to a judge of the court proposed findings of fact and recommendations for the disposition, by a judge of the court, of any motion excepted in subparagraph (A), of applications for posttrial [1] relief made by individuals convicted of criminal offenses and of prisoner petitions challenging conditions of confinement.

This is not a "pretrial matter pending before the court" and therefore judges Armijo and Garcia have demonstrated, in writing, inability of a judge to proceed under Rule 63, Rule 53 and, consequently, 28 U.S.C. § 455.

Futhermore, from our July 24, 2007 14:02 criminal complaint affidavit sent to you, you must realize that the judges mentioned by Garcia have systematically denied us our right to trial by jury guaranteed inviolate by 7^th Amendment to US Constitution and 28 USC Rule 38. So we have been forced to seek justice in several other courts including different states.

The criminal complaint affidavit we sent was received by your office on 8:43 AM on August 1, 2007.

The criminal complaint affidavit, with all evidence of guilt of accused in writing in court records, names, among other judges Wyoming chief judge Downes, and New Mexico judges Conway, Garcia, Scott, and Brown.

Garcia attempts to use rulings by Wyoming chief judge Downes, and New Mexico judges Conway, Scott, and Brown to justify imposition of $10,000 sanctions against us.

But let's focus on the Title 18 felony violation of law Garcia committed in writing and take appropriate actions.

Garcia writes on page 12 of docket entry 95

The Court recommends that Plaintiffs’ pleadings 81, 82, 84, 85, 91, 93 and 94 be stricken, and that Payne be personally sanctioned in the amount of $10,000, and that Morales be sanctioned in the amount of $10,000.

Docket entry 85 "REPLY to Response to Motion re 81 MOTION to Set Aside Judgment filed by William H Payne, Arthur R Morales. (pz) (Entered: 06/12/2007)" in section 15 contains the criminal complaint affidavit

placed before the court.

The criminal complaint against Zibigniew Brzezinski should be properly investigated and disposed of by judge M Christina Armijo.

Garcia by recommending that docket entry 85, and others, be stricken has violated, in writing in a court record, § 1510. Obstruction of criminal investigations

(a) Whoever willfully endeavors by means of bribery to obstruct, delay, or prevent the communication of information relating to a violation of any criminal statute of the United States by any person to a criminal investigator shall be fined under this title, or imprisoned not more than five years, or both.

[w]ith intent to obstruct a judicial proceeding, ...

Element of bribery

Title 18 § 203

(a) Whoever, otherwise than as provided by law for the proper discharge of official duties, directly or indirectly—

(1) demands, seeks, receives, accepts, or agrees to receive or accept any compensation for any representational services, as agent or attorney or otherwise, rendered or to be rendered either personally or by another— ...

(B) at a time when such person is an officer or employee or Federal judge of the United States in the executive, legislative, or judicial branch of the Government, or in any agency of the United States,

in relation to any proceeding, application, request for a ruling or other determination, contract, claim, controversy, charge, accusation, arrest, or other particular matter in which the United States is a party or has a direct and substantial interest, before any department, agency, court, court-martial, officer, or any civil, military, or naval commission; or or employee; shall be subject to the penalties set forth in section 216 of this title. ...

is shown because Garcia is not acting "as provided by law for the proper discharge of official duties" and "[r]eceives, accepts, or agrees to receive or accept any compensation ...", which is Garcia's federal salary.

Failure to bring Brzezinski to justice casts a dark shadow of corruption on judicial and government branches.

Further, a failure to bring Brzezinski, and others, to justice may be an invitation for retaliation by those aggrieved by what Brzezinski and others have done.

Therefore, if judge the judge replacing Armijo does not grant requested relief in 97-cv-00266-MCA-LFG and properly begin processing the Brzezinski criminal complaint by August 24, 2007, then you are assigned the task of seeing that the Brzezinski and Garcia criminal complaints are properly processed as authorized under Title 18 § 4.

Misprision of felony Whoever, having knowledge of the actual commission of a felony cognizable by a court of the United States, conceals and does not as soon as possible make known the same to some judge or other person in civil or military authority under the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both. You are the nearest military authority.

These unfortunate matter should have been settled years ago and are likely to become far more serious if not settled soon.

Sincerely,


William H. Payne
13015 Calle de Sandias NE
Albuquerque, NM 87111
bpayne37@comcast.net


Arthur R. Morales
465 Washington St SE
Albuquerque, NM 87108
amorales58@comcast.net

distribution

Judge M Christina Armijo
mcaproposedtext@nmcourt.fed.us

U.S. House of Representative Committee on the Judiciary
United States Senate Committee on the Judiciary

Armijo and Garcia apparently did not read, "a judge may designate a magistrate judge to hear and determine any pretrial matter pending before the court. ..." So what is this all about?

Look what Armijo wrote!

The Queeg balls [Captain Queeg removes the steel balls from his pocket and he spins them in his palm insistently as he speaks] are clicking again.

But Armijo and Garcia are doing it to themselves all in writing in court records.

(1) Where he has a personal bias or prejudice concerning a party, or personal knowledge of disputed evidentiary facts concerning the proceeding;

(b)

(1) Notwithstanding any provision of law to the contrary—

(A) a judge may designate a magistrate judge to hear and determine any pretrial matter pending before the court, except a motion for injunctive relief, for judgment on the pleadings, for summary judgment, to dismiss or quash an indictment or information made by the defendant, to suppress evidence in a criminal case, to dismiss or to permit maintenance of a class action, to dismiss for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted, and to involuntarily dismiss an action. A judge of the court may reconsider any pretrial matter under this subparagraph (A) where it has been shown that the magistrate judge’s order is clearly erroneous or contrary to law.

(B) a judge may also designate a magistrate judge to conduct hearings, including evidentiary hearings, and to submit to a judge of the court proposed findings of fact and recommendations for the disposition, by a judge of the court, of any motion excepted in subparagraph (A), of applications for posttrial [1] relief made by individuals convicted of criminal offenses and of prisoner petitions challenging conditions of confinement.

(C) the magistrate judge shall file his proposed findings and recommendations under subparagraph (B) with the court and a copy shall forthwith be mailed to all parties.

(1) demands, seeks, receives, accepts, or agrees to receive or accept any compensation for any representational services, as agent or attorney or otherwise, rendered or to be rendered either personally or by another— ...

(B) at a time when such person is an officer or employee or Federal judge of the United States in the executive, legislative, or judicial branch of the Government, or in any agency of the United States,

Label/Receipt Number: 7006 2760 0005 0089 3982
Status: Delivered
Your item was delivered at 8:43 AM on August 1, 2007 in KIRTLAND AFB, NM 87117.

Tuesday July 24, 2007 14:02

Certified return receipt requested

http://www.prosefights.org/nmlegal/dcvoid/dcvoid.htm#feehan1

Col. Terrence A. Feehan, Commander
Nuclear Weapons Center
2000 Wyoming Bvld SE
KAFB, NM 87116

Dear Col. Feehan:

Title 18 crimes have been committed against us with all evidence in writing in court records by New Mexico chief judge Parker, Wyoming chief judge Downes, Utah chief judge Benson, and New Mexico judges Conway, Hansen, Garcia, Scott, Brown and Vazquez in their attempts to avoid monetary settlement for wrongs done us by Sandia National Laboratories.

In 1992 Sandia manager James Gosler, we learned when the FBI declassified a Wayne R Gilbert letter on December 8, 2006, turned William Payne into the FBI Albuquerque office for some yet unknown national security crime. Payne denys committing any crimes. Payne was fired from Sandia Labs in 1992.

Legal efforts to obtain settlement were thwarted when judges Parker, Downes, Benson, Conway, Garcia, Scott, Brown and Vazquez exceeded their jurisdiction.

Arthur Morales and Manuel Garcia sued Sandia labs as leaders in a class action lawsuit for race discrimination. Sandia was forced into an expensive settlement. Subsequently Sandia Labs retaliated against Morales so Morales sued twice.

Hansen thwarted Morales' legal efforts by exceeding his jurisdiction by denying right to trial by jury.

In 1996 Morales and Payne joined forces to legally do something about judicial misconduct. Our joint legal effort was  CIV NO 97 0266 SC/DJS.

This case was dismissed improperly by the late judge Santiago Campos.

We demanded jury trial guaranteed inviolate by 7^th Amendment to US Constitution and 28 USC Rule 38.

Therefore we invoked right to file to void judgment or order under Federal Rule of Civ. P. 60(b)(4) allows

Any judgment rendered by a court which lacks jurisdiction, either of the subject matter of the parties, or lacks inherent power to enter the particular judgment, or entered an Order which violated due process or was procured through extrinsic or collateral fraud, is null and void, and can be attacked at any time, in any court, either directly or collaterally, provided that the party is properly before the court.

Docket of CIV NO 97 0266 SC/DJS shows that on 05/16/2007 plaintiffs elected to file Motion to Set Aside Judgment as is their right under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Motion was properly docketed on May 16, 2007.

Because of this action we are being threatened by judges

[i]mposition of sanctions, including censure, striking pleadings, imposition of fines and/or incarceration of the Plaintiffs. ...

and

[t]he imposition of sanctions, including but not limited to, censure, striking pleadings, and imposition of fines. ...

1 http://www.prosefights.org/nmlegal/dcvoid/dcvoid.htm#motion
2 http://www.prosefights.org/nmlegal/dcvoid/dcvoid.htm#notice

We have been advised to invoke

Title 18 § 4. Misprision of felony

Whoever, having knowledge of the actual commission of a felony cognizable by a court of the United States, conceals and does not as soon as possible make known the same to some judge or other person in civil or military authority under the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both.

You are the nearest military authority.

So we enclose the original of our criminal complaint affidavit which is posted on Internet at http://www.prosefights.org/nmlegal/dcvoid/dcvoid.htm#criminal for your proper processing.

Evidence of guilt of the accused in all in writing in court records so investigation should lead to prompt issuance of summons.

We ask to receive copies of the summons when they are issued.

Sincerely,


William H. Payne
13015 Calle de Sandias NE
Albuquerque, NM 87111
bpayne37@comcast.net


Arthur R. Morales
465 Washington St SE
Albuquerque, NM 87108
amorales58@comcast.net

distribution

Ms Nancy Mayer-Whittington
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
U.S. District Court Clerk’s Office
333 Constitution Avenue, NW, Room 1225,
Washington, DC 20001

U.S. House of Representative Committee on the Judiciary
United States Senate Committee on the Judiciary

Tuesday July 24, 2007 09:25

We phoned Feehan's office.

Terry Walker is a PR person.

We learned that General Gabreski located at Wright Patterson AFB.

Sunday July 22, 2007 13:29

Others have faced the problems of the judiciary not doing their job properly processing a criminal complaint affidvit. Others advised us on a possible solution. A military base complaint.

AF Oath of Office

Oath: I, ___, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; and that I will obey the orders of the president of the United States and the orders of the officers appointed over me, according to regulations and the Uniform Code of Military Justice. So help me God.

§ 4. Misprision of felony

Whoever, having knowledge of the actual commission of a felony cognizable by a court of the United States, conceals and does not as soon as possible make known the same to some judge or other person in civil or military authority under the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both.

Kirtland Air Force Base, New Mexico

Col. Terrence A. Feehan
Commander

Let's verify tht Feehan is, in fact, base commander and get a mailing adddresss.

NUCLEAR WEAPONS CENTER (NWC)
Commander ........................... CC ............. 846-6567
Executive Officer .................. CCE ........... 846-2494
Secretary ............................... CCS ........... 846-6567

We spoke with secretary Lt Martagon. At first Martagon was not going to give a mailing address. Then there was a long pause while Martagon conferred with some other[s]. The Martagon supplied the information

Col. Terrence A. Feehan, Commander
Nuclear Weapons Center
2000 Wyoming Bvld SE
KAFB, NM 87116
c/o Terry Walker

We have a plan in the case judge Armijo disagrees that

6 When rule providing relief from void judgments is applicable, relief is mandatory and is not discretionary. ⁴

Title 18 § 4. Misprision of felony

Whoever, having knowledge of the actual commission of a felony cognizable by a court of the United States, conceals and does not as soon as possible make known the same to some judge or other person in civil or military authority under the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both.

A criminal complaint affidavit directed to Kirtland AFB against federal court miscreants?

Our opposition judges and others are racking up Title 18 USC 241 and 242 [Morales in a minority class member] felony violation of law in writing.

Monday July 23, 2007 13:24

Certified return receipt requested

http://www.prosefights.org/nmlegal/dcvoid/dcvoid.htm#clerk

Ms Nancy Mayer-Whittington
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
U.S. District Court Clerk’s Office
333 Constitution Avenue, NW, Room 1225,
Washington, DC 20001

Dear Ms Mayer-Whittington:

Enclosed is MOTION TO VACATE JUDGMENTS FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA MANDATORY JUDICIAL and NOTICE AND AUTHORITIES TO VOID JUDGMENT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA.

We also enclose two checks for $175 each for the filing fee.

Please return only a file stamped copy of the first page of our two filings.

New Mexico federal court only requires that an original copy be filed since the original are scanned and sent electronically to PACER.

Our two filings are posted on Internet at

1 http://www.prosefights.org/nmlegal/dcvoid/dcvoid.htm#motion
2 http://www.prosefights.org/nmlegal/dcvoid/dcvoid.htm#notice

The posting contain links to copies of the court documents referenced in our assertions.

We have been threatened us with "[i]mposition of sanctions, including censure, striking pleadings, imposition of fines and/or incarceration of the Plaintiffs. ..." for our filing for void judgment in   CIV NO 97 0266 SC/DJS in New Mexico so we ask that the NO CONTACT ORDER be promptly signed an a copy sent to us, preferably by email.

Criminal complaint affidavit for these threats and denial of our civil right have been sent to the commander at Kirtland AFB for processing.

Judge Harry Edwards was advised about this matter in complaint sent to him on July 16, 1996

and received



But nothing positive happened in 1996 with judge Edwards and clerk Bradford Baldus to help settle these unfortuante matters.

Matters have gotten far worse since then.

We hope that our filings will be properly processed and that this will lead to peaceful settlement of these unfortunate matters

§ 241. Conspiracy against rights

If two or more persons conspire to injure, oppress, threaten, or intimidate any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District in the free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege secured to him by the Constitution or laws of the United States, or because of his having so exercised the same; or

If two or more persons go in disguise on the highway, or on the premises of another, with intent to prevent or hinder his free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege so secured— They shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and if death results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill, they shall be fined under this title or imprisoned for any term of years or for life, or both, or may be sentenced to death.

§ 242. Deprivation of rights under color of law

Whoever, under color of any law, statute, ordinance, regulation, or custom, willfully subjects any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States, or to different punishments, pains, or penalties, on account of such person being an alien, or by reason of his color, or race, than are prescribed for the punishment of citizens, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both; and if bodily injury results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include the use, attempted use, or threatened use of a dangerous weapon, explosives, or fire, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and if death results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill, shall be fined under this title, or imprisoned for any term of years or for life, or both, or may be sentenced to death.

Charge 1

New Mexico 12 person jury trial lawsuit CV 2000-10278 is removed to federal court without mandatory verification by assistant US attorney Phyllis A Dow on 11/27/2000.

New Mexico CV 2000-10278 is given federal case number 00cv01677. It is assigned to judge William F Downes by New Mexico chief judge James A Parker on 03/27/2001.

Parker denies civil right of complainant Payne to 12 persons jury trial New Mexico CV 2000-10278.

Parker violates § 241. Conspiracy against rights in writing in court record.

Charge 2

New Mexico 12 person jury trial lawsuit CV 2000-10289 is removed to federal court on
without mandatory verification by assistant US attorney Raymond Hamilton on 11/08/2000.

New Mexico CV 2000-1028900 is given federal case number 00cv1574. Case is reassigned from judge Martha Vazquez to to judge William F Downes by New Mexico chief judge James A Parker on 03/27/2001.

Parker denies civil right of complainants Morales and Payne to 12 persons jury trial New Mexico CV 2000-1028900.

Parker violates § 241. Conspiracy against rights in writing in court record.

Charge 3

New Mexico 12 person jury trial lawsuit CV-2001-03118 is removed to federal court without mandatory verification by French law firm and private attorney Christina E Anaya representing state defendant judge Ted Baca on 06/04/2001.

New Mexico CV 2001-03118 is given federal case number 01 cv 0634. New Mexico chief judge James A Parker recuses all judicial officers of the District of New Mexico; and reassigns the case to the Hon. William F. Downes, Chief U.S. District Judge District of Wyoming on 06/12/2001.

Parker denies civil right of complainants Morales and Payne to 12 persons jury trial New Mexico CV 2001-03118.

Parker violates § 241. Conspiracy against rights in writing in court record.

Charge 4

New Mexico 12 person jury trial lawsuit CV 2001-06293 is removed to federal court without mandatory verification by assistant US attorney Michael H Hoses.

New Mexico CV 2001-6293