Anita Langley viz.

Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2008 10:12 AM
To: Bill Payne
Subject: hello from anita

Happy Valentines Day!
www.anitalangley.net/bridge.mp3

from Vancouver.

Anita's husband is Michael Riconoscuito's cousin.

-----Original Message-----
From: Anita Langley [mailto:anila@telus.net]
Sent: Friday, February 15, 2008 4:15 PM
To: bill payne
Subject: RE: artists

That would be me on both counts. :-)

-----Original Message-----
From: bill payne [mailto:bpayne37@comcast.net]
Sent: February 15, 2008 2:56 PM
To: Anita Langley
Subject: artists

Anita

Identity of the pianist and singer in your nice valentine message?

best
bill

-----Original Message-----
From: anita [mailto:anila@telus.net]
Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2008 9:40 AM
To: bill payne
Subject: Fw: Thompson 02112008 The trial begins today.

IS PUPPET MASTER MICHAEL RICONOSCIUTO PULLING THE STRINGS IN THE BETTY CLOER MURDER TRIAL?

Robert S Mueller III
Director
Federal Bureau of Investigation
J. Edgar Hoover Building
35 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Washington, D.C. 20535-0001

1 bring to your personal attention that Sandia National Laboratories duped the FBI into believing that I had improper communications with a Japanese professor.

The false statement "In his complaint, he disclosed classified information relating to your agency [National Security Agency]." was only brought to my attention by declassification of FBI Assistant Director in Charge, Intelligence Division, Wayne R Gilbert's January 28, 1993 letter to National Security Agency General Council Steward R Baker.

This false document was responsive to my 1996 FOIA/PA request to the FBI. But it was never sent for my review. Nor was I given an opportunity to request corrections.

At the time of my firing I was assigned to SECRET/SCI FBI project to break electronic locks for the FBI at Sandia National Laboratories in 1992.

I questioned the legality of my FBI job assignments.

2 bring to your attention to an apparently unnecessary form sent to me on October 23, 2006 [mailed October 24, 2006] by your subordinate FBI David M Hardy after I completed a similar request FOIPA Public Liaison Officer (PLO) Nancy L. Steward on October 2, 2006.

3 complain that Mr Hardy returned my letter of October 5, 2006 with an apparently diversionary request instead of answering my letter and providing me information requested in 1996.

4 inform you that Department of Justice lawyer James Kovakas blew the whistle on the FBI by informing me on November 30, 2005 that the FBI was in non-compliance of my request by not sending me 60 pages of documents requested in 1996.

5 request the identity of FBI Supervisory Special Agent referenced in Gilbert's January 28 1993 letter [see red dot].

Department of Justice employee Jean Kornblut apparently incorrectly, in light of the Gilbert letter, identified a FBI Supervisory Special Agent as responsible for my firing.

6 inform you, Attorney General Alberto Gonzales and NSA Director Keith Alexander that we are headed for a visible, public, disruptive, embarrassing, damaging, and expensive FOIA/PA pro se lawsuit in federal court in the UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA to obtain the documents referenced in Gilbert's letter.

No charges brought against me for divulging classified information seems to indicate classification abuse.

We will show that NSA, DOJ, DOE, the FBI and judicial systems are broken. This will be be reported to the appropriate authorities.

7 inform you that two New Mexico felony fraud and other felony crimes have been committed in the US government's incompetent attempts to avoid fair settlement.

Note: we were defrauded out of $644 for two paid-for 12 person jury trial Breach of Contract [not a tort] lawsuits guaranteed inviolate by both New Mexico and federal Constitutions against former second judicial district chief judge W John Brennan et al who chose to try to protect the FBI, NSA, Department of Energy rather than do his job.

Our civil right to trial by jury guaranteed inviolate by the 7th Amendment to the Constitution and New Mexico Constitution has been violated twice, by criminals, in writing.

Our civil right to represent ourselves pro se guaranteed by the 10th Amendment to the Constitution has been violated twice, by criminals, in writing.

See crime 1 evidence in writing.

See crime 2 evidence in writing.

8 suggest that we get these unfortunate matters settled before they get far worse.

Either DOJ/FBI goes to judge Thomas at the supreme court to void judgments or we do directly after January 22, 2007.

Unsigned green card received Friday December 29, 2006.

Wednesday December 20, 2006 13:21

http://www.prosefights.org/nmlegal/fbifoia/fbiletter3/letter.htm#codirector

Email via julia.eichhorst@ic.fbi.gov and certified return receipt requested mail

This is in response to a referral received from Department of Justice, Civil Division, totaling 63 pages, requesting the Federal Bureau of Investigation to review the information for classification and disclosure determination and respond directly to you.

The original request for FOIA/PA documents was made in 1996. The FBI decided not to comply with the rules of the FOIA/PA and give me responsive documents.

Department of Justice lawyer James Kovakas blew the whistle on the FBI by informing me on November 30, 2005 that the FBI was in non-compliance of my request by not sending me documents requested in 1996.

Hardy writes

Of the 63 pages, one page was duplicate to the page being released to you and 61 pages were court records, removed per your instructions in your original request to National Security Agency, instructing them to exclude all court motions, pleadings, official court records, and documents you authored. Part of the information in the document being released to you is being withheld pursuant to subsections(s) (b)(2), (b)(6), (b)(7)(C), of Title 5, United States Code, Section 5521552a. See the enclosed form for an explanation of these exemptions.

Hardy attempts to create the appearance that documents referenced by Kovakas are those I already have and removed in my 1996 request. This may be either true or false.

However, Hardy released a January 28, 1993 previously SECRET letter, declassified on December 6, 2006, authored by FBI Assistant Director in charge, Intelligence Division Wayne R Gilbert which points to other documents responsive to my 1996 FOIA/PA request to the FBI but not released.

FOIA exemption (b)(7)( B ) states "would deprive a person of a right to a fair trial or an impartial adjudication"

Withholding documents associated with Gilbert's letter deprives me both of an impartial adjudication and right to a fair trial.

Hardy wrote

You may appeal any denials by writing to the Co-Director, Office of Information and Privacy, United States Department of Justice, 1425 New York Aye, N.W., Suite 11050, Washington, D.C., 20530-0001, within sixty days from the date of this letter. The envelope and the letter should be clearly marked Freedom of Information Appeal' or "Information Appeal." Please cite the FOIPA number assigned to your request so that it may easily be identified.

1 All classified documents possessed by Sandia labs, FBI, DOE, and NSA containing my name related to Wayne R Gilbert's January 28, 1993 letter are subjected to a mandatory declassification review.

2 I want copies of all documents forwarded by Sandia Labs to the FBI and DOE.

3 I want copies of all documents the FBI supervisory special agent, identified by red dot,



sent to Gilbert.

5 I want copies of all documents Gilbert sent to NSA.

6 I want copies of all documents NSA sent to the FBI and DOE.

7 I want copies of all documents the FBI sent to Sandia labs and the FBI Albuquerque office.

8 I want an unredacted copy of the Gilbert letter.

9 Note that both Gilbert's and Baker's name are not redacted so Supervisor Special Agent identified by red dot should not be redacted. Besides Supervisory Special Agent is personally involved in New Mexico criminal defamation. Exemptions included with Hardy's letter do not apply.

10 Items 1-9 shall be completed within the 20 working days specified by FOIA/PA rule starting today with email receipt of this appeal to send me ALL DOCMENTS THAT HAVE MY NAME ON THEM. This is January 19, 2006.

I have a right to review and request corrections to these documents.

CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED

Mr. William H. Payne
13015 Calle de Sandia NE
Albuquerque, NM 87111

Re: Case No. TFA-0198

Dear Mr. Payne:

The Department of Energy (DOE) has considered the Freedom of Information Appeal you filed on March 26, 2007. As the enclosed Decision and Order indicates, the DOE has determined that the Appeal be granted in part.

If you have any questions regarding this Decision and Order, please contact the Office of Hearings and Appeals, Department of Energy, 1000 Independence Avenue, S.W., Washington, DC, 20585, telephone number (202) 287-1449.

Sincerely,

William M. Schwartz
Senior FOJA Official
Office of Hearings and Appeals

Enclosure

On March 23, 2007, William H. Payne (Appellant) filed an Appeal from a determination issued by the Department of Energy's (DOE) National Nuclear Security Administration Service Center (NNSASC) in Albuquerque, New Mexico. The determination responded to a request for information filed under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), 5 U.S.C. § 552, as implemented by the Department of Energy (DOE) in 10 C.F.R. Part 1004. If granted, NNSASC would be required to respond to the Appellant's request.*/

In an electronic mail message sent February 2,2007, the Appellant sent a letter to NNSA which stated:

I ask that your office sees that Sandia National Laboratories and [DOE] complies with my original FOIA! PA request and send me documents alluded to in the Gilbert letter and seen at docket entry #3 at CJV-92-1452-JC.

***

I ask that you send me a copy of

((9) establish rules of conduct for persons involved in the design, development, operation, or maintenance of any system of records, or in maintaining any record, and instruct each such person with respect to such rules and the requirements of this section, including any other rules and procedures adopted pursuant to this section and the penalties for noncompliance;

_____________________________

*/All OHA decisions may be accessed at http://www.oha.doe.gov/foial.asp.

(10) establish appropriate administrative, technical, and physical safeguards to insure the security and confidentiality of records and to protect against any anticipated threats or hazards to their security or integrity which could result in substantial harm, embarrassment, inconvenience, or unfairness to any individual on whom information is maintained;

procedures 9 and 10 for Sandia National Laboratories and the [DOE].

Request dated February 2, 2007.

On February 21, 2007, NNSASC sent a letter to the Appellant. Letter dated February 21, 2007, from Carolyn Becknell, FOLA Officer, NNSASC, to William H. Payne (February 21, 2007 Letter). NNSASC first stated that it was

unable to identify what specific records you are requesting from the information that you have supplied. As to your request for a copy of the procedures relating to what you have referenced as "(9) and (10)", [DOE] regulations, . . , provide rules and procedures that are followed in responding to FOJA and Privacy Act requests.

February 21,2007 Letter at 1. NNSASC then informed the Appellant that it had reviewed its records and found no pending request that he had filed. Id. It continued that it would take no further action at this time. Id.

On March 23,2007, the Appellant appealed NNSASC's February 21,2007 letter, contending that the documents he is seeking are clearly identified in "Mr. Gilbert of the FBI recently declassified letter [that] has identified the documents sent to the FBI by Sandia National [L]aboratories and Mr. Goslar's AFFIDAVIT." March 23, 2007 Appeal Letter. The Appellant continued that he explained "this in my Wednesday February 28, 2007 10:43 email to Bucknell." Id.

The Appellant asks that NNSASC comply with his original FOJA/PA request and send documents alluded to in another letter, which was not included with his February 2,2007 request. Secondly, he asks that NNSA send him a copy of procedures (9) and (10), and appears to quote them, but he does not give a citation for them or indicate what they refer to.

We understand the position NNSASC expressed in its February 21,2007 response to be that it was unable to identify what specific records the Appellant is requesting from the information that he supplied. For example, NNSASC had no idea what the Appellant meant by" original FOLA! PA request." The Appellant has made numerous FOJA requests to NNSASC over many years. None of them is currently pending, so the Appellant could have been referring to any of his earlier requests, or none of them. In addition, it is not clear what the Appellant is requesting by asking for a copy of "(9) and (10)." Even a request for a broad scope of documents must be clear enough for the agency to determine what documents are being requested. Yeager v. DEA, 678 F.2d 315,322,326 (D.C. Cir. 1982) (holding valid request encompassing over 1,000,000 computerized records: "The linchpin inquiry is whether the agency is able to determine 'precisely what records [arel being requested."' (quoting S. Rep. No. 854, 93d Cong., 2d Sess. 12 (1974)).

Nevertheless, DOE regulations require that the

[r]equest must be in writing and for reasonably described records. A request for access to records must be submitted in writing and must reasonably describe the records requested to enable DOE personnel to locate them with a reasonable amount of effort. Where possible, specific information regarding dates, titles, file designations, and other information which may help identify the records should be supplied by the requester.

10 C.F.R. § 1004.4(b). As it is currently stated, the Appellant's request does not reasonably describe the records he is requesting. He did not provide specific information regarding dates, titles, and other information so that NNSASC might identify the information he was requesting. He provided nothing but the statement that he was requesting what was in his original request or "copies of (9) and (10)." NNSASC cannot be expected to know what the Appellant wanted or to search through past requests to try to determine which, if any, he intended by referring to his "original request." Further, it should not be required to do the research necessary to determine the identify of the document named at "docket entry #3 at CIV-92-1452-JC." The Appellant must also clearly identify "(9) and (10)."

B. NNSASC's Response

DOE Regulations require an office assist a requester in restating a request that it does not understand.

Assistance in reformulating a non-conforming request. If a request does not reasonably describe the records sought, as specified in paragraph (c)(1) of this section, the DOE response will specify the reasons why the request failed to meet the requirements of paragraph (c)(1) of this section, and will invite the requester to confer with knowledgeable DOE personnel in an attempt to restate the request or reduce the request to manageable proportions by

reformulation or by agreeing on an orderly procedure for the production of the records.

10 C.F.R. §1004.4(c)(2). NNSASC did not contact the Appellant to have him explain his request. Thus, on remand, NNSASC should offer the Appellant the opportunity to clarify what documents he is requesting. We have reached this conclusion previously in a similar situation. Barbara Schwarz, 27 DOE 80,245 (December 2, 1999) (Case No. VFA-0536) (http: / /www.oha.doe. gov / cases /foia/ vfa0536.htm).

For the reasons explained above, we will remand this matter to NNSASC to contact the Appellant for a further explanation of what he is requesting. Therefore, we will grant the Appellant's Appeal in part.

It Is Therefore Ordered That:

(1) The Appeal filed by William H. Payne, Case No. TFA-0198, is granted as set forth in paragraph (2) below, and is in all other respects denied.

(2) This matter is hereby remanded to the National Nuclear Security Administration Service Center for further proceedings in accordance with the instructions set forth in this Decision and Order.

(3) This is a final order of the Department of Energy from which any aggrieved party may seek judicial review. Judicial review may be sought in the district in which the requester resides or has a principal place of business, or in which the agency records are situated, or in the District of Columbia.

William M. Schwartz
Senior FOJA Official
Office of Hearings and Appeals

Date: APR 192007

We understand the position NNSASC expressed in its February 21,2007 response to be that it was unable to identify what specific records the Appellant is requesting from the information that he supplied.

For the reasons explained above, we will remand this matter to NNSASC to contact the Appellant for a further explanation of what he is requesting

You have not yet contacted me.

Identification of the documents, along with their location at the FBI and New Mexico federal court, is REAL SIMPLE.

You merely contact Mr Gilbert of the FBI and ask what documents James Gosler/Sandia sent to the FBI. You can do this through

Nancy L. Steward (540) 868-4516, FBI
FOIPA Public Liaison Officer (PLO)

Then you contact judge John Conway of New Mexico federal court to identify the affidavit Gosler sent Conway.

If either the FBI or judge Conway claims that the documents are classified, then I ask you to instruct either or both the FBI or Conway to forward the documents to NARA for mandatory declassification review.

Mr Schwartz wrote in the last paragraph of his April 17, 2007 DECISION AND ORDER OF THE DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

(3) This is a final order of the Department of Energy from which any aggrieved party may seek judicial review. Judicial review may be sought in the district in which the requester resides or has a principal place of business, or in which the agency records are situated, or in the District of Columbia.

If you are unsuccessful at getting the documents from former FISA judge John Conway and the FBI, then I will be forced to sue judge Conway and FBI director Mueller pro se in the District of Columbia with a 12 person jury DEMAND to get the documents.

Unauthorized distribution of the false and defaming documents seen at http://www.prosefights.org/nmlegal/supremecourt/cvpa.htm#gallegos is a criminal violation of the FOIA/PA. Apparently I have been falsely charged at the FBI with national security crime. We all need to see the remainder of these documents.

We, of course, continue to counsel settlement of these unfortunate matters before they get far worse.

I ask that you see the requested documents are subject to mandatory declassification review by NARA and delivered to me within 20 working days.

William Payne
505-292-7037
bpayne37@comcast.net

distribution
art morales ; Jean.Kornblut@usdoj.gov ; Jim.Kovakas@usdoj.gov ; the.secretary@hq.doe.gov ; julia.eichhorst@ic.fbi.gov ; iscap@nara.gov ; bill.leonard@nara.gov ; AskDOJ@usdoj.gov; william.schwartz@hq.doe.gov

APR 2 4 2007

CERTIFIED MAIL - RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED

Mr. William H. Payne
13015 Calle de Sandias NE
Albuquerque, NM 87111

Dear Mr. Payne:

This letter is in reference to the Decision and Order of the Department of Energy, Case Number TFA-O 198, issued on April 19, 2007 by Mr. William M. Schwartz. A copy is enclosed. The Decision and Order asked that I contact you for further explanation of your request.

Please consider this letter the request for further explanation of your request as remanded in the Decision and Order. Provide your information to me in writing. Your attention to this matter is greatly appreciated.

My email address is cbecknell@doeal.gov.

Sincerely,

Freedom of Information Act Officer
Office of Public Affairs Enclosure

Department of Energy
National Nuclear Security Administration
Service Center
P. 0. Box 5400
Albuquerque, NM 87185

MAY 11 2007

CERTIFIED MAIL - RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED

Mr. William H. Payne
13015 Calle de Sandias NE
Albuquerque, NM 87111

Dear Mr. Payne:

This letter is in reference to your April 30, 2007 e-mail to me that responded to my April 24, 2007 letter to you in which I asked you for further explanation of your Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request as remanded in the April 19, 2007 Decision and Order of Mr. William M. Schwartz, Office of Hearings and Appeals.

I reviewed the e-mail mentioned above and also reviewed the copies of the e-mails dated April 25, 2007 and April 27, 2007. I am responsible for FOIA requests for records in the possession and control of the Department of Energy (DOE), National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA). In reviewing your request, it appears that you are requesting records that are in the possession and control of other agencies. I have concluded this based on the fact that rather than identifying DOE/NNSA records that you are requesting, you have provided the names of people and agencies I can contact to obtain responsive records. Pursuant to the Act and our regulation, 10 CFR, Part 1004, you must file your request for records with the agency that maintains possession and control of the records.

Because you are not asking me for records from this Agency, I am unable to process your request. You may treat this response as a failure to locate responsive records and file an appeal.

Carolyn A. Becknell
Freedom of Information Act Officer
Office of Public Affairs

This letter is in reference to the Decision and Order of the Department of Energy, Case Number TFA-O 198, issued on April 19, 2007 by Mr. William M. Schwartz. A copy is enclosed. The Decision and Order asked that I contact you for further explanation of your request.

Please consider this letter the request for further explanation of your request as remanded in the Decision and Order. Provide your information to me in writing. Your attention to this matter is greatly appreciated.

I believe I gave you specific description of the documents I requested, but were not given to me or even identified as long ago as 1993, in my Friday April 27, 2007 12:25 email.

Perhaps the ps in the email I sent to Jay Bosanko at NARA on Wednesday, April 25, 2007 9:31 AM will clarify the importance to inspect the charge documents.

Apparently the national security violation charges made against me to judge John Conway and the FBI are classified. Perhaps improperly classified. Therefore, we enlist the help of William J. Bosanko Associate Director, Classification Management Directorate to subject the documents certainly possessed by Sandia National Laboratories, the FBI and NSA to Mandatory Declassification Review.

Your help in obtaining these well-identified documents authored by Gosler/Sandia and assisting to see that they are subjected to Mandatory Declassification Review would be appreciated.

To this end Mr Bosanko sent an Wednesday, April 25, 2007 9:04 AM email which included attachments which I have link to help us with the Mandatory Declassification Review process.

We are now in the process of voiding judgements, which recently includes our original NSA FOIA lawsuit, for lack of jurisdiction.

We continue to believe that settlement is best for everyone.

William Payne
505-292-7037
bpayne37@comcast.net

distribution
amorales58@comcast.net ; Jean.Kornblut@usdoj.gov ; Jim.Kovakas@usdoj.gov ; the.secretary@hq.doe.gov ; julia.eichhorst@ic.fbi.gov ; iscap@nara.gov ; bill.leonard@nara.gov ; AskDOJ@usdoj.gov; william.schwartz@hq.doe.gov;tapodaca@doeal.gov; foiofficer@doeal.gov; foialo@nsa.gov

"I'm really exhilarated and honored to have this opportunity; I had an opportunity to work with Gus Simmons [a retired Sandia Fellow] in my early years. He had a significant impact on me at the Lab. He took the time to provide input and guidance. He helped me along the way. So it's particularly delightful for me to now hold the same position."

This requires elaboration.

Gus Simmons was trying to get NSA to switch from the NSA Benincasa shift register sequence authentication algorithm to public key.

Simmons gave a talk to some Sandians and NSA employees. Simmons plastered the blackboard with symbols.

Payne's supervisor Dr John Holovka [PhD chemist] and others asked Payne if he knew what Simmon was talking about.

Payne responded positively.

Holovka gave Payne the job assignment to write a simple explanation of what Simmons was trying to sell. That's the reason for public key tutorial which was NOT SENT TO Japan.

Sandian Mike Norris

Michael J. Norris received his Ph.D. from Harvard in 1944 under Saunders MacLane ... He has been with Sandia Laboratories since then except for a temporary ...

and Gus Simmons got together to invent an algorithm for evaluating the reciprocal to eliminate the division required for public key evaluation.

Then they put their algorithm in silicon. And into some weapons system.

The algorithm apparently worked most of the time, reported numerical analyst Dr Richard Hanson.

Norris and Simmons apparently didn't run simulations to test the algorithm before commiting it to silicon.

Big bucks to fix the Norris-Simmons screw-up.

Let's settle before matters get FAR FAR worse.

Says Jim, "One of the loves of my life is what has historically been known as blackhatting. In the past, I've pulled together a collection of diverse technical people looking for vulnerabilities in weapons components that bad guys might attempt to exploit, with the idea of getting there before they do. Over the last 15 years, I've been deeply involved with the operational world and finding novel applications of technology to support that world. I suppose that broadens the definition of Sandia Fellow in the Labs; I don't fit the Brinker-Osbourn scientist mold.

[Google: Brinker-Osbourn Did you mean: Brinker-Osbourne]

Google results So we agreed that the three of us get together on problems of national interest where the blend of our expertise could be useful in finding solutions to these problems and perhaps provide seed material for others within the lab."

Says Jim, "One thing I want to do with the remaining parts of my career is to take all that I have learned technically, programmatically, and operationally and apply that as best I can helping the people back East solve problems relating to the war on terrorism, and help Sandians apply their wonderful technical capabilities in supporting those efforts. The three of us are pretty different in our background, so we may get a lot done.

"I'm really exhilarated and honored to have this opportunity; I had an opportunity to work with Gus Simmons [a retired Sandia Fellow] in my early years. He had a significant impact on me at the Lab. He took the time to provide input and guidance. He helped me along the way. So it's particularly delightful for me to now hold the same position."

Clandestine information technology

While Jim's work is harder to itemize (imagine a series of blackouts here), it can be said that Jim was Sandia's first loaned employee to the National Security Agency, beginning a partnership between Labs and Agency that continues to this day. He solved problems there that many considered unsolvable, emerging as perhaps the preeminent expert in vulnerability assessment. In 1995, he was named Sandia Manager of the Year and also received Sandia's first NOVA award from Lockheed Martin for leadership. In 1996, then-CIA director John Deutsch requested Jim's support in establishing Information Operations as a core element of the CIA's clandestine technical collection arsenal. Jim was named Founding Director of the CIA's Clandestine Information Technology Office. After six months of analysis, Jim reengineered his office to take advantage of available synergies, which enabled CITO to achieve extraordinary impact on US national security. Among his awards are the Director of Central Intelligence Director's Award, the Intelligence Medal of Merit, the National Intelligence Medal of Achievement, and the Clandestine Service Medallion. "

There were a lot of talented people already there working in these areas and I just brought coherence," he says, a description that itself speaks for his ability to work with others.

We recently discovered that one should have an AVATAR when posting on blogs. So here's Payne's 1969 avatar.



Google results.

Carter has not responded viz.

Attack Iran? Why Not Just Paint Targets on the Backs of Kids Like Those on PBS's "Carrier"? viz.

EROIs (energy return on investments) viz.

Try a police department statement viz.

Technical people, as opposed to liberal arts and lawyer educated, prepared this first report draft. viz.

Our $22,036 senior citizens savings viz.

Brzezinski and Saddam viz.

WWIII immenent? viz

Bomb, Bomb, Bomb, Bomb, Bomb, Iran viz.

Let's hope for cooler temperatures and settlement. viz

Scared in Texas viz.

My best understanding is that some judges were not properly benched? viz.

Jim Rogers viz.

Concerns that PNM may go bankrupt viz.

Legally, illegally, it does not matter, they have the power. Plan on your stuff being gone. viz

Us phds are communicating. viz

Temperature Monitors Report Widescale Global Cooling viz

Creo que es la verdad. viz

Natural gas costs look to increase viz

Peak oil overthrows green revolution viz

New construction may be the most imporant problem? viz

Do you think New York governor David Paterson: First Openly Peak Oil Aware Governor is also aware that ... viz

NSA Iran spy sting lawsuit We may have a judge without credentials. viz

New construction industries, albuquerque. viz

email dumping viz.

PNM natural gas presents foil viz.

Thank you for your recent program submission to the Military Channel viz

eroei evades liberal arts educated media and lawyers, viz

from High Desert viz

four to ten years and begins the year the utility files its plan with the Commission viz

New Mexico Thornburg may be a great buy. viz

More drugging the troops viz.

New Mexico has a program not to let the poorest people freeze to death. viz

A serious power crunch developing in Guangdong. viz

Try working on the US legal system. viz.

Let's see how pnm deals with the problems. viz

cheers from us guys viz

We will pass the word along viz.

The FBI may help by this weekend. viz.

Asphalt peak oil problems viz.

What to do think is going to happen? viz

Oil Shortage Could Derail Chinese Economy viz

coal viz

Governors: black coal must be part of green energy debat viz

Increased Violence and Climate Change viz

WSJ: America's Back Working On The Railroads viz

Cheers from New Mexico and the FBI viz.

Cable cuts history? viz.

Optimists believe viz

Electric rate increases viz

4 Billion cars by 2050 viz.

Dark days for lawyers too, we hope. viz

Anita Langley viz.

What's up? viz.

This may not be good news for Persians. viz

cablc cuts viz.

Guys, we've been attending pnm irp meetings for viz reasons. viz.

With many Tajiks spending what little money they have on fuel to heat their homes viz.

We are, of course, promoting the peaceful settlment agenda. viz.

(Subject line) 9 cut undersea cables viz

We agree. viz

PNM is in the process of running Monte Carlo [a New Mexico thing] portfolio simulations. viz.

I wonder at the wisdom of keeping anything in a safe deposit box viz.

click on A Crude Awakening. viz

Confused senior viz.

Vampire gadgets viz.

This is why I rarely look at the energy bulletin. viz.

compressed air/natural gas viz.

Peaceful settlement of unfortunate US/Iran matters viz.

Excitement for sure. Money hopefully. viz

It's tough to make predictions, especially about the future. viz

95 % of Israel's electricity is generated by imported coal and other fossil fuels. viz.

History Channel Doomer Porn Day viz.

Austin,TX apparently powered-down its natural gas electrical generation plants about 2-4 years ago in the spring for maintenance. viz

An empire from a tub of goo. viz.

Cormac McCarthy may have written the ultimate doomer book. viz

Without Internet technology and the spy sting on IRAN, and Hans Buehler our legal project would not have been possible. viz

What do you think the USA is going to about Iran? viz

What's going to happen with coal? viz

Cost of coal caused Cornwall mines problems, I've read. viz.

Energy is a subject of my interest, not my expertise. viz

Biomass comparison to other energy sources. viz

Isn't this what was planned? viz.

Arbeit macht frei New Mexico viz.

A brownout. viz

Are you sure? viz.

settlement with us government after 16 years? viz

pnm distributed on Wednesday January 16, 2008 an informative foil on cost of electrical energy generation by technology. viz.

Deutchland uber alles viz.

Settlement proposal. viz.

We're attending for visibility reasons ... and interest too. viz.

Let's bring up load-shedding. viz

Peak oil overthrows green revolution. viz.

It's not how you get into these things that matters, it's how you get out of them that counts. viz.

Let's all hope for peaceful settlement. viz

Let try to negotiate a peacful settlement to these unfortunate matters. viz.

Do you think WWIII is imminent? viz.

VW microbus owner told me sniffing water works to improve mileage. viz.

I liked the comment about critical peer review. viz.

Are you saying that Hubbert's normal model is incorrect? viz.

We, of course, continue our essential non-gas-wasting energy investigating senior citizen trips.viz.!

All of this [heating and cooling the whole cave] may not last too longer in the future? viz.

Poordogabone viz.

But this is sure interesting to watch. viz.

Liberal arts major investors may be attracted. viz.

Settlement may be a better idea viz

Turning an Oil Tanker viz.

I am interested in understanding what it would take to avoid the consequences of the projected climate disruption caused by a regional nuclear conflict. viz.

Sniff viz.

USS Nimitz (CVN-68 ) departed San Diego on Monday April 2, 2007 for the Persian gulf. viz.

Where will the Nimitz be on April 2, 2008? viz.

Does anyone believe WWIII is immanent? viz.

Another Monday, another crisis on the High Seas viz.

It is probably no exaggeration to state that this 20th century version of the "Trojan horse" is quite likely the greatest sting in modern history. viz.

We deserve every bit of what is coming. viz.

Do you want genocide? viz.

What information have you transmitted? viz.

sorry if my writing skills are not the best viz.

Where Will Natural Gas Close a Year From Now? viz.

Let's move ahead to 1917 viz.

Us cats viz

Wind power Texas viz.

Bite Me, New York Times viz.

Us cats viz.

Cryptome John Young is on to The NSA-Crypto AG Sting TOO.

We advocate peaceful settlment of these unfortunate matters. viz.

The NSA-Crypto AG Sting J Orlin Grabbe posted link viz
For years US eavesdroppers could read encrypted messages without the least difficulty Ludwig De Braeckeleer viz

Let's move back 90-100 years to Ft Snelling in Minnesota. viz.

It was faster to get from Downtown Minneapolis to downtown Saint Paul over a 100 years ago than present day. viz

Cheers ... from the team. viz

Maybe you have screwed with viz.

They certainly realize that we are running out of energy. viz

Borijove Jeytic viz

Brady monument company viz.

Lawmaker: Iran to build 19 more nuclear plants.viz

More No attack on Iran, we hope. viz.

No attack on Iran, we hope. viz.

Our Persians friends viz.

Frank Stern, Summit Blue, plug-in car viz.

MILLIONS OF households could be hit by 15% price hikes in their energy bills next year. viz

Both take lots of gas viz.

(5) An attack on Iran? viz.

Got a reply from Brown. viz.

Good grief Bas, you as your avatar suggests, is a dark character. viz.

PNM is proposing a fuel cost adjustment to help mitigate the risk of fuel volatility. viz.

Pro Iran? viz

The intentions of the Iranians are patently obvious to the world. viz.

His 1995 series, "No Such Agency," a six-part chronicle of NSA with reporter Scott Shane, was nominated for a Pulitzer Prize.

Wider Spying Fuels Aid Plan for Telecom Industry

Let's all hope for cool heads on both sides and peaceful settlement of these unfortunate matters. viz.

ns sherlock viz.

lets cancel those irritating laws of thermodynamics. viz

Smart growth is an oxymoron. We’d be better off if we spent our energy finding ways to slow the growth rate. viz.

Look who is reading peak oil.

PNM avatar viz.