New Mexico attorney general Patricia
Madrid
and
candidate for US house of representatives to
possibly replace Heather Wilson
First posted
Saturday
August 26, 2006 15:48
Updated
Tuesday October 31, 2006 07:55
http://www.prosefights.org/nmlegal/madrid1/madrid.htm#madrid
----- Original Message -----From: Mayor Martin Chavez
To: bpayne37@comcast.net
Sent: Monday, October 30, 2006 2:59 PM
Subject: Breakfast Honoring Patricia MadridDear Friend,
There's just one week to go until Election Day and Attorney General Patricia Madrid needs our help. We need to raise as much money as possible for a last minute media and get-out-the-vote blitz.
You're cordially invited to join me for a special breakfast honoring Attorney General Madrid.
What? Breakfast with Mayor Martin Chavez & Attorney General Patricia Madrid
When? Tuesday, October 31. 7:30 - 9:30 am
Where? Flying Star Restaurant (Downtown), 723 Silver SW, AlbuquerquePlease RSVP to Mark Fleisher (505) 699-6994 or mfleisher@aol.com. If you are unable to attend, please send a check to:
Madrid for Congress c/o Mark Fleisher 1850 Old Pecos Trail, Suite J Santa Fe, NM 87505
Thank you so much for your support. With your help, we will put Patricia Madrid over the top!
Sincerely,
Mayor Martin Chavez
Paid for by Madrid for Congress, Inc.
Gary King democratic candidate for attorney general of New Mexico.
Ursula from Madrid's campaign phoned Payne on the morning of Thursday October 19, 2006 to ask who Payne was going to vote for.
Payne explained that Madrid had not responded to our certified letter.
Payne asked for an email address. Ursula gave Payne 242-6000.
Payne phoned 242-6000 at 13:05. Cory answered.
Payne explained that Ms Madrid has not responded to our certified letter. Payne told Cory that it would be easier to explain the situation in writing. So Cory gave Payne his email address at cory@madridforcongress.com.
Cory
Please ask Patricia Madrid to respond to
http://www.prosefights.org/nmlegal/madrid1/madrid.htm#madrid
Thanks in advance
bill
Sunday August 27, 2006 14:42
http://www.prosefights.org/nmlegal/madrid1/madrid.htm#madrid
Certified return receipt mail and email
patricia.madrid@ago.state.nm.us
madrid@madridforcongress.com
Patricia A Madrid
New Mexico Attorney General
P.O. Drawer 1508
Santa Fe, NM 87504-1508Dear attorney general Madrid:
Second judicial district attorney Kari Brandenburg was sent both by email and certified mail, return receipt requested several prima facie [all evidence of felony criminal guilt of accused in writing] criminal complaints on Tuesday May 23, 2006.
Return receipt green card shows that Brandenburg's office received complaints on May 24, 2006.
Brandenburg was asked to respond by June 7, 2006.
We received no response from Brandenburg as of Sunday August 27, 2006.
Nakamura's office received our certified letter on March 27, 2006.
We asked for a response from Nakamura by April 7, 2006.
We received no response from Nakamura as of Sunday August 27, 2006.
Neither Nakamura or Brandenburg wrote us to tell us that there was something wrong with our criminal complaints.
Nonresponse appears to be Nakamura's and Brandenburg's way of not doing their jobs and thus apparently ignoring their oath of office.
We ask that you complete the enclose questionnaire by September 15, 2006 so as to not ignore your oath of office.
Questionnaire response is required for the reason that you are a lawyer.
Lawyers, we have found in our 14 year legal project, are notorious in evasion of facts.
Verified responses to TRUE and FALSE questionnaire leaves little room for attempted lawyer evasion.
We ask that you direct second judicial district district attorney Kari Brandenburg to serve the summons directed to the parties identified in our May 23, 2006 letter or tell us why are complaints are invalid.
We ask that you send us a copy of your letter to Brandenburg by September 15, 2005.We continue to believe that settlement of these unfortunate matters is best and enlist your settlement help.
Sincerely
Arthur R. Morales
465 Washington St SE
Albuquerque, NM 87108
505-323-7277William H. Payne
13015 Calle de Sandias NE
Albuquerque, NM 87111
505-292-7037
DistributionRichard Bosson
Chief judge
Supreme Court of New Mexico
PO Box 858
Santa Fe, New Mexico 87504-4860
richard.bosson@supremecourt.nm.org and certified mail return receipt requested
jnakamura@metrocourt.state.nm.us
Sensenbrenner@mail.house.gov
arlen_specter@specter.senate.gov
1 Seventh Amendment to the US Constitution states? Verified New Mexico and Federal Constitutional Law and New Mexico Judicial Procedure and Rules Questionnaire and Responses
of
New Mexico attorney general Patricia A Madrid
U.S. Constitution: Seventh Amendment
In Suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved, and no fact tried by a jury, shall be otherwise re-examined in any Court of the United States, than according to the rules of the common law.
Response.
TRUE
FALSE
2 New Mexico Constitution ARTICLE II Bill of Rights states?
Section 1. [Supreme law of the land.] The state of New Mexico is an inseparable part of the federal union, and the constitution of the United States is the supreme law of the landResponse.
TRUE
FALSE
3 New Mexico Constitution ARTICLE II Bill of Rights states?
Sec. 12. [Trial by jury; less than unanimous verdicts in civil cases.]
The right of trial by jury as it has heretofore existed shall be secured to all and remain inviolate. In all cases triable in courts inferior to the district court the jury may consist of six. The legislature may provide that verdicts in civil cases may be rendered by less than a unanimous vote of the jury.Response.
4 No. CV 2001 07994 is a paid for 12 person jury trial.
TRUE
FALSEResponse.
5 No. CV 2002 3425 is a paid for 12 person jury trial.
TRUE
FALSEResponse.
TRUE
FALSEResponse.
7 Are United States state courts bound by abide by paid for trial by jury guaranteed by new Mexico and US Constitutions?
TRUE
FALSEResponse.
8 A New Mexico state judge cannot dismiss a paid for trial by jury lawsuit guaranteed inviolate by federal and state constitutions?
TRUE
FALSE
1-041. Dismissal of actions.
A. Voluntary dismissal; effect thereof.(1) Subject to the provisions of Paragraph E of Rule 1-023 and of any statute, an action may be dismissed by the plaintiff without order of the court:
(a) by filing a notice of dismissal at any time before service by the adverse party of an answer or other responsive pleading; or
(b) by filing a stipulation of dismissal signed by all parties who have appeared generally in the action. Unless otherwise stated in the notice of dismissal or stipulation, the dismissal is without prejudice, except that a notice of dismissal operates as an adjudication upon the merits when filed by a plaintiff who has once dismissed an action based on or including the same claim.
(2) Except as provided in Subparagraph (1) of this paragraph, an action shall not be dismissed on motion of the plaintiff except upon order of the court and upon such terms and conditions as the court deems proper. If a counterclaim, cross-claim or third-party claim has been filed by a party prior to the service upon such party of the plaintiff's motion to dismiss, the action shall not be dismissed against the party's objection unless the counterclaim, cross-claim or third-party claim can remain pending for independent adjudication by the court. Unless otherwise specified in the order, a dismissal under this paragraph is without prejudice.
B. Involuntary dismissal; effect thereof. For failure of the plaintiff to prosecute or to comply with these rules or any order of court, a defendant may move for dismissal of an action or of any claim against the defendant. After the plaintiff, in an action tried by the court without a jury, has completed the presentation of evidence, the defendant, without waiving the right to offer evidence in the event the motion is not granted, may move for a dismissal on the ground that upon the q facts and the law the plaintiff has shown no right to relief. The court as trier of the facts may then determine them and render judgment against the plaintiff or may decline to render any judgment until the close of all the evidence. If the court renders judgment on the merits against the plaintiff, the court shall make findings as provided in Rule 1-052.
Unless the court in its order for dismissal otherwise specifies, a dismissal under this paragraph and any dismissal not provided for in this rule, other than a dismissal for lack of jurisdiction, for improper venue, or for failure to join a party under Rule 1-019, operates as an adjudication upon the merits.
C. Dismissal of counterclaim, cross-claim or third-party claim. The provisions of this rule apply to the dismissal of any counterclaim, cross-claim or third-party claim. A voluntary dismissal by the claimant alone pursuant to Subparagraph (1) of Paragraph A of this rule shall be made before a responsive pleading is served, or if there is none, before the introduction of evidence at the trial or hearing.
D. Costs of previously dismissed action. If a plaintiff who has once dismissed an action in any court commences an action based upon or including the same claim against the same defendant, the court may make such order for the payment of costs of the action previously dismissed as it may deem proper and may stay the proceedings in the action until the plaintiff has complied with the order.
E. Dismissal of action with and without prejudice.
(1) Any party may move to dismiss the action, or any counterclaim, cross-claim or third-party claim with prejudice if the party asserting the claim has failed to take any significant action to bring such claim to trial or other final disposition within two (2) years from the filing of such action or claim. An action or claim shall not be dismissed if the party opposing the motion is in compliance with an order entered pursuant to Rule 1-016 or with any written stipulation approved by the court.F. Applicability. This rule shall apply to all civil cases filed in the district court, including civil cases appealed from the metropolitan or magistrate courts. This rule shall not apply to:(2) Unless a pretrial scheduling order has been entered pursuant to Rule 1-016, the court on its own motion or upon the motion of a party may dismiss without prejudice the action or any counterclaim, cross-claim or third party claim if the party filing the action or asserting the claim has failed to take any significant action in connection with the action or claim within the previous one hundred and eighty (180) days. A copy of the order of dismissal shall be forthwith mailed by the court to all parties of record in the case. Within thirty (30) days after service of the order of dismissal, any party may move for reinstatement of the case. Upon good cause shown, q the court shall reinstate the case and shall enter a pretrial scheduling order pursuant to Rule 1- 016. At least twice during each calendar year, the court shall review all actions governed by this paragraph.
(3) The filing of a motion for dismissal pursuant to this rule shall not be taken to be an entry of appearance in said action or proceeding.
(1) guardianship, receivership, trusteeship or conservatorship cases;
(2) proceedings commenced pursuant to the Mental Health and Developmental Disabilities Code;
(3) proceedings commenced pursuant to the provisions of the Probate Code; or
(4) proceedings commenced pursuant to the Children's Code.[As amended, effective January 1, 1990.]
Response.
9 The Tenth Amendment to the US Constitution states?
TRUE
FALSE
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.Response.
10 The Tenth Amendment to the US Constitution gives the constitution right for a citizens to represent themselves pro se in a US court?
TRUE
FALSEResponse.
12 Citizens have a Tenth Amendment constitutional right to represent themselves in a demanded jury trail guaranteed inviolate by the Seventh Amendment to the Constitution and New Mexico?
TRUE
FALSEResponse.
13 If a judge rules without jurisdiction is the appropriate remedy
TRUE
FALSE
A appeal judge's ruling.
B seek writ to void ruling?Response.
14 Does New Mexico have a way to void a ruling made without jurisdiction?
A
BResponse.
15 Are New Mexico elected and appointed officials required to sign an Oath of Officer?
TRUE
FALSE
Section 1. [Oath of officer.] Every person elected or appointed to any office shall, before entering upon his duties, take and subscribe to an oath or affirmation that he will support the constitution of the United States and the constitution and laws of this state, and that he will faithfully and impartially discharge the duties of his office to the best of his ability.Response.
TRUE
FALSE17
Verification
Under penalty of perjury as provided by law, the undersigned certifies that material factual statements set forth in this pleading are true and correct, except as to any matters therein stated to be information and belief of such matters the undersigned certifies as aforesaid that the undersigned verily believes the same to be true.
Notary Public ______________________________________I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.
Executed on ___________.
Patricia A Madrid_____________________
Payne got an email from Heather Wilson on Thursday September 21, 2006 and responded.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Representative Heather Wilson"
To:
Sent: Thursday, September 21, 2006 10:28 AM
Subject: A reply from Heather Wilson
Thank you for contacting me. I appreciate hearing from you.
If you did not include your name and New Mexico address in your e-mail,
please re-send it with your name and New Mexico address in the body of the
message. Our resources are limited and we can only afford to respond to
New Mexicans.
Some letters we can answer quickly by e-mail. Others take more research
time and you will receive a response by regular mail or e-mail. I try to
answer all my e-mail and mail in two weeks or less.
Please continue to visit our website at http://www.wilson.house.gov for
information about Congress and how it affects New Mexico. You can also
sign up for the e-newsletter on our website. We will protect your privacy
by not sharing your e-mail address with anyone. If you choose to
unsubscribe, you can do so at any time by e-mailing me.
Warm Regards,
Heather
No ack from Fleisher as of 15:51. Here's the last portion of the call Payne got from Fleisher.
Payne did not give Fleisher his number but he found it somewhere.
Albuquerque mayor Martin Chavez sent Payne an email concerning New Mexico attorney general and congressional candidate Patricia Madrid.
Morales phoned approval and directed that Madrid be added to distribution.
Fleisher just phone Payne to ask when the email is coming! Payne recorded the last part of the conversation!!!
Sent 10:17.
Friday September 22, 2006 10:03
mfleisher@aol.com
Mr Fleisher
You spoke with Bill Payne on Friday September 22, 2006.
New Mexico Attorney General Patricia Madrid was contacted both by email and certified mail and asked to complete this questionnaire by September 15, 2006.
We did not receive a response from Attorney General Madrid.
We ask that you approach Attorney General Madrid to explain that her failure to respond to our questionnaire cast serious doubt on her bid to become a US congressperson.
Non-response creates the impression that Attorney General Madrid is violating her oath of office, along with DA Kari Brandenburg, to protect New Mexico criminals.
We ask that you see to it that Attorney General Madrid returns a verified copy of our questionnaire by Wednesday September 27, 2006.
Any help you and Mayor Chavez can give to get these unfortunate matters settled would be greatly appreciated.
Please send an ack if you get this email.
SincerelyArthur R. Morales
amorales58@comcast.net
505-323-7277William H. Payne
bpayne37@comcast.net
505-292-7037Distribution
kbrandenburg@da2nd.state.nm.us
martinchavez@cabq.gov
madrid@madridforcongress.com
patricia.madrid@ago.state.nm.us----- Original Message -----
From: Mayor Martin Chavez
To: bpayne37@comcast.net
Sent: Wednesday, September 20, 2006 9:13 AM
Subject: Paul Rodriguez in ABQ! Fundraiser for Patricia Madrid
Dear Friend,
Legendary comedian Paul Rodriguez is coming to Albuquerque for a benefit in honor of Attorney General Patricia Madrid - and you're invited! The show will take place at the ABQ Convention Center's KIVA Auditorium (2nd & Marquette NE) on Wednesday, September 27th at 7:30 pm. I am contacting you before this event is announced to the public.
Tickets are available only by calling Ticketmaster at 505-883-7800. General admission tickets are $35 or $65. Your $1,000 donation includes an intimate pre-show celebrity bash, an after show party and the very best seats in the house! Your $300 donation includes a preferred seating and admission to the special after party.
Paul Rodriguez' career has spanned more than two decades and includes starring roles and featured appearances in over 30 films and countless television series and specials. Most recently, Paul was the master of ceremonies for this summer's Latin Kings of Comedy tour which played to sold out shows across the country.
Please, join Attorney General Madrid and me for this special benefit performance. If you have any questions, please call Ticketmaster at 505-883-7800, or Mark Fleisher at (505) 699-6994 (his E-mail address is mfleisher@aol.com).
I want to thank Paul Rodriguez for donating his time and talent to help elect Patrica Madrid to Congress. I hope to see you at this special event!
Sincerely,
Mayor Martin Chavez
www.madridforcongress.com
Paid for by Madrid for Congress, Inc.
Morales just phoned. Morales points out that these guys are used to working under the covers. But now we are ripping off the covers.
Let's see if we can get Contarino to respond.
Monday July 25, 2005
Contarino, Dave
Department: Office of the Governor
Division: GOV
Phone: 505-476-2200
Email: Dave.Contarino@state.nm.us
|
|
Building the questionnaire [designed so thatPatricia Madrid gets all answers right] calls on another of Payne's professional skills: Test and Measurement
Anderson is one of Payne's PhD students in psychology.
Payne got his start in computing at Purdue starting in 1959 computerizing Purdue Public Opionion Poll and the Purdue Freshman Placement Test as research assistant in Purdue Educational Reference [later Measurement and Research] center. And now these skills will be applied to Nino Scalia and
generalissmo Suter. Along with more recently necessary
acquired computer skills too, of course. |
|
Let's see if we can get Contarino to respond.
|
Below two emails may be the best payne has ever gotten.


We suspect rahaaii [parsi] is reading this. :)