The Albuquerque Tribune will publish its final edition Saturday, ending a buoyant and sometimes bare-knuckled presence as the city's afternoon newspaper.

E.W. Scripps Co., The Tribune's Cincinnati-based owner, today said the U.S. Department of Justice - which had closely monitored a six-month effort to sell the newspaper - was aware of the decision to cease publication of the 86-year-old Tribune.

The newspaper's 38 editorial employees were told of Scripps' decision by Editor Phil Casaus in a staff meeting this morning.

"It's a difficult day, but there is a lot to celebrate about The Tribune, and don't think that's limited merely to the people who work here or have worked here," Casaus said.

The Department of Justice was required to monitor the sale or closure because it oversees the newspaper's joint operating agreement with the Albuquerque Journal. The agreement has allowed the papers to share certain business functions while operating independent newsrooms.

Scripps announced in August it would sell or discontinue publication, saying it had determined the Albuquerque market couldn't support an afternoon newspaper.

The Trib's daily circulation in January was about 9,600, Casaus said. In 4988, the newspaper sold about 42,000 copies a day.

"The loss of The Albuquerque Tribune is profoundly sad for the community, its dedicated staff, and all those great journalists who have contributed over the years to the newspaper's outstanding reputation for editorial independence and excellence," said Rich Boehne, executive vice president and chief operating officer for Scripps.

"As The Tribune passes into history, we take some solace in the knowledge that Albuquerque and New Mexico are better places to live today thanks to the newspaper's commitment to community service," he added.

The Tribune - which won a Pulitzer Prize in 1994, was a finalist for journalism's highest award in 1996 and consistently won state and national awards - will publish a commemorative edition Saturday to celebrate its 86 years of

Covering Albuquerque and New Mexico, Casaus said.

Other looks back at The Tub and the city it covered will appear in' Thursday's and Friday's editions. "This newspaper has been an important voice, and I think anyone who's read it understands that it cares deeply about this community and state," Casaus said. I The Tribune, which won the Pulitzer for national reporting in 1994 for reporter Eileen Welsome's series "'The Plutonium Experiment," began as Magee's Independent in 1922. It was purchased by Scripps a year later and was named the New Mexico State Tribune until Feb. 20,1933-75 1 years ago today - when it became The Albuquerque Tribune. After the August announcement only one bidder emerged from 1 Scripps' search for a buyer: Albuquerque public relations executives Tom Carroll and Doug Turner.

But after months of negotiations with Scripps, the pair withdrew their offer Feb. 1, with Can-oil saying: "We were unable to put the package together."

The Trib publishes six days a week. It has operated since 1933 under the joint operating agreement with the Journal Publishing Co., which owns the Albuquerque Journal.

The Trib and Journal editorial staffs have operated independently of each other. Under terms of the agreement, Albuquerque Publishing Co., formed by the two partners, has been responsible for the business operations of The Trib, including advertising, subscription sales, production and distribution.

The benefits of that agreement would not have been part of any sale of The Tribune, meaning a potential owner would have to create the business, advertising and production arms of the newspaper virtually from scratch.

Scripps and Journal Publishing Co. shared the combined profits generated by both newspapers. Under a new agreement with Journal Publishing, Scripps will continue as a partner in Albuquerque Publishing Co.

Joint operating agreements axle allowed under the Newspaper Preservation Act of 1970 and fall under the oversight of the Justice Department.

A group of concerned readers. working under the name Friends of the Albuquerque Tribune have also expressed interest in saving the newspaper and operating it as a nonprofit. The group plans a meeting Thursday night to discuss its efforts to acquire the newspaper.

Albuquerque Tribune Wednesday February 21, 2008

Purpose of this editorial is to expose, by example, how our legal system has been corrupted by lawyer business goals as opposed to the efficient administration of justice.

We do this by describing a journey of two pro se litigants (citizens acting as their own attorney) into the legal system seeking justice.

What is the old saying, 'power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely'. This has become more evident with ENRON, Enron, Anderson, Tyco, Merrill-Lynch, Global Crossing, WorldCom, and many other big business scandals. This is not a new or uncommon thing; that is why we have an old saying. However, the big difference today is wrongdoing is not only acceptable but is in vogue.

Crooked officials stay in office and even get re-elected. Other people are appointed long term or obtain positions with no accountability. Some are even protected by 'absolute immunity'. That sounds like absolute power to me. There are powerful groups that fit in this category, such as upper management in big business and the legal system. These exclusive societies are able to deceive and take advantage for their own personal grain. The people in these societies are also able to protect each other by means of 'professional courtesy.

The problem with the legal system is that the goals of truth and justice are too often replace with gamesmanship, status, control and power. When you can add to that no accountability, absolute immunity and professional courtesy, then disaster is eminent. Then don't have to obey their own rules or even the laws of the land. That is what has happened in our case that we share with you below.

They can get away with this because in most cases few people know what's going on. When it becomes know to people capable resolving the situation, they hesitate or stop because of personal risk of confronting this powerful group. We know, for we have confronted them and have felt the effects of their misuse of power.

What has allow us to survived to date, as pro se litigants, is studying the law, doing what right to the best of our ability and using internet.

With internet in an instant you can let the whole world know what is happening. One needs to be careful about the misinformation on the Internet. That is why our testimony is well documented, backed up the law citations and through sworn testimony. Here is our short synopsis of Morales and Payne's legal struggles.

ARTHUR MORALES and Manuel Garcia head a class action lawsuit CIV 91-614 against Sandia National laboratories [Sandia] for national origin discrimination in 1991. Morales and Garcia hired lawyers Kelleher and McLeod for this lawsuit.

The class portion of the suit was settled out of court and hundreds of women and minorities were compensated for mistreatment. Morales and Garcia were not a part of the compensation but were allowed to pursue their own discrimination claims in court.

Morales pursued his claims with lawyer John Kulikowski of Keleher and McLeod, PA. Morales had a bench trial heard by Las Cruces magistrate Judge Joe Galvan from 1/30/95 to 2/6/95. Galvan heard the case and ruled against Morales on all counts on 8/28/95.

However in September 1995, Morales files an appeal (case#95-2204) as pro se litigant to the Tenth circuit citing overwhelming examples and incidents that warrants a new trial.

On 12/7/95 Karen C. Kennedy of Simmon Cuddy and Friedman and Debra Wells of Karen Kennedy and Associates filed an responding brief for the appellee/Sandia. The 10th Circuit informed Kennedy and Wells their brief was deficient and not in compliance with the rules of Federal Appellate Court procedures.

January 16, 1996 Kennedy/Wells files untimely a response to deficient brief, and never send a copy to appellant Morales as required. Morales moved the court to clarify the situation, and to discipline opposing counsel for their actions. Court refused to do so.

On March 19, 1996 Morales wrote to Tenth Circuit chief judge Stephanie Seymour to complain that Tenth Circuit was not obeying its own rules. Seymour did not respond.

Note: As you will see below Bill Payne had the same problem of late filings to the 10th Circuit Court by the same law firm of Simons, Cuddy and Friedman. This is when the uniting of our efforts in the courts as pro se litigants became a necessary and effective.

On April 2, 1996 Morales' pro se appeal to the Tenth Circuit in 1995 was denied by circuit Judges Anderson, Barrett and Logan. Even though, these judges agreed that there was clear error in the finding of fact, Morales failure to submit case transcript (costing thousands of dollars) to proof his points. Morales was also denied oral argument preventing him from providing damaging proof.

A filled Freedom of Information Act [FOIA] request as of December 31, 1995 revealed that Morales cost Sandia $567,137 in legal fees.

On 3/17/97 Morales filed another pro se lawsuit, CIV 97-350, against Sandia. Morales believed and had evidence that Sandia was retaliating against him for his past civil rights and legal actions against Sandia.

Morales soon found out that judge Leroy Hansen did not favor pro se litigants. Hansen: 1) denied Morales right of trial by jury, 2)ruled Morales had not cooperated in discovery and fined Morales $2,160.85; 3) denied Morales pertinent witnesses and evidence to prove his case; 4) denied Morales an opening statement at trial to indicate position and rational for direction of his argument; 5) ruled against Morales on all counts without providing Finding of Fact and Conclusion of Law for his ruling.

Morales appealed again as pro se to the Tenth Circuit. This time with court transcript and a 22 page brief with continual specific references in the transcript of hostile, demeaning, prejudice and bias of Hansen against Morales. Not only was it evident on the transcript but also to witness that were in the courtroom.

However, New Mexico lawyer and Tenth Circuit judge Paul J Kelly signed ORDER AND JUDGMENT denying Morales' appeal on November 13, 2000. http://www.kscourts.org/ca10/cases/2000/11/00-2029.htm

WILLIAM PAYNE was fired by Sandia National Laboratories on July 28, 1992. Sandia alleged some sort of national security violation.

Payne file a complaint with the Equal Equal Opportunities Employment Commission [EEOC] in Albuquerque.

EEOC Ray Armenta handled Payne's case. Armenta pressed Sandia for documents detailing why Payne was fired. Sandia refused Armenta's request for documents.

Armenta encouraged Payne to sue Sandia since Armenta told Payne he had about the best case he has seen for improper termination.

Payne filed suit pro se for wrongful discharge in 1993 with a jury trial demand. Shortly after Santa Fe lawyers Steve Aarons took Payne's case.

Daniel Friedman of Simons, Cuddy and Friedman represented Sandia.

Judge John Conway presided with judge William Deaton as magistrate.

Conway promptly halted discovery. Payne complained to Aarons he should move to start discovery. Aarons told Payne that he file a motion to start discover.

Finally Aarons filed

1 Whether by inadvertence, the press of federal caseloads, or design, the court suggested at a pretrial conference in May 1993, that both parties suspend further discovery until it ruled on defendants' summary judgment motion. Discovery has ceased ever since.

2 Nearly one year ago, on August 19, 1993, the court issued its amended protective order, effectively sealing all substantive pleadings in this case.

3 Before issuing that order, the court considered plaintiff's written response against sealing. Judge Conway informed all counsel in open court that James R. Gosler would be permitted to deliver unknown documents to Judge Conway at time and place certain.

4 Judge Conway apparently reviewed those documents in camera without counsel for plaintiff.

5 The communication with Gosler constitutes an improper, ex parte communication with the one defendant who has been charged in plaintiff's amended complaint with the most outrageous and culpable acts.

6 Given the nature of this lawsuit, where defendants allege some sort of security infraction by plaintiff as justification for his firing, such communication under the guise of national security violated plaintiff's due process rights. Plaintiff has been prejudiced by this improper communication coupled with protracted delays. ...

WHEREFORE Plaintiff William H. Payne requests that:

A Judge Conway recuse himself from further participation in these proceeding, based on improper communication with defendant Gosler,

B The newly designated judge reconsider the standing protective order without recourse to ex parte communications with a named defendant, or in the alternative, allow counsel for plaintiff to review and respond to such communications, and,

C The court deny defendants' long-standing motion for summary judgment, set new discovery deadlines under the circumstances, and grant such further relief as justice requires.

Aarons Law Firm Counsel for Plaintiff ...

Payne paid Aarons about $6,000 to reach this point.

Conway dismissed Payne's case shortly after Aarons' filing, then sealed all documents in the case.

Payne appealed pro se to the Tenth Circuit. Payne filed his brief.

Friedman missed the Tenth Circuit deadline for filing the Brief of the Appellees.

Tenth Circuit rules stated that if a deadline is missed without previous approval, then the court will not accept filing.

Payne filed for award of remand on the basis of no response.

Friedman file a late brief. Friedman's stuffed an unstamped envelope in Payne mail box several days late.

Payne returned this to the post office who return it to Friedman. Later Payne received the brief with falsified certificate of service.

Despite this, the Tenth circuit upheld Conway's, then also sealed all documents. This is why there is no record at http://www.kscourts.org/ca10/dcktlist/dcktlist.htm.

In March of 1992 Swiss national Hans Buehler is arrested espionage in Teheran.

Buehler was employed by Crypto AG. Buehler is held in solitary confinement in the Evin military prison.

Buehler spends 9.5 months in prison before he is released for $1,000,000 US.

Buehler phones Payne from Zurich on December 31, 1993. Payne and Buehler exchange information regarding "spiking" of crypto units. Buehler sends Payne letter on January 4, 1994, This letter is posted at http://www.geocities.com/CapitolHill/Congress/8327/buehlerpayne.html

December 3-25, 1995 Baltimore Sun publishes series of articles on the National Security Agency [NSA] exposing role in "spiking" the Crypto Ag's crypto units so that the key is transmitted with the cyphertext. This allows decryption of supposedly-secret messages.

The Sun reported on Sunday December 10, 1995, pp. 9-11

Engineers 'turning white'

If crypto AG was offered a deal by NSA in return for rigging its products, it would not be alone. The approach to American firms usually comes during discussions with NSA's export licensing office.

"It is not unheard of for NSA to offer preferential export treatment to a company if it builds a back door into its equipment," says one person with experience in the field. "I've seen it. I've been in the room."

NSA's pitch varies. "Generally with high-level executives it's an appeal to patriotism -- how important it is for us to listen to the world," this source says. "With the mid-level commercial types, it's, 'Do this and well give you preferential export treatment.' To the real technical people, it's, 'Why don't you do this?' And you don't realize what's being suggested until you see the engineers are turning white." ...

January 22, 1996 Electronic Engineering Times [EET] publishes a similar article.

Iranian engineers read EET.

June 10, 1996 Payne issues a FOIA to NSA administrator Bruce Bottomly, for all NSA intercepted Iranian messages and translations between January 1, 1980 and June 10, 1996 and all NSA intercepted Libyan messages and translations between January 1, 1980 and June 10, 1996.

NSA administrator Bottomly was a graduate student in computer science at Washington State University in 1960s where Payne was a professor.

Bottomly and NSA employee Simard told Payne not to help Sandia labs with its cryptographic projects in 1992

NSA does not respond to the FOIA request.

Morales and Payne are both upset by their unfair treatment by the courts. They join forces to try to do something to correct this.

In their first action Morales and Payne decide to see if FOIA laws work.

February 28, 1997 Morales and Payne jointly sue Lieutenant General Kenneth A. Minihan, Director, National Security Agency for the requested documents.

Judge Santiago Campos is assigned judge with Don Svet as magistrate.

The lawsuit and filing progress are posted on http://cryptome.org/

Requested documents are denied. And an appeal to the Tenth Circuit is denied as well. The appeal denial as well as a letter from Hans Buehler as posted at http://www.prosefights.org/baltimoresun/shanebowman.htm#buehlerlet.

In the course of this lawsuit, Svet sanctions Morales and Payne $625 for improper discovery. Morales and Payne deny this.

On February 7, 1999 Svet proceeds to garnish the $625 from Morales Sandia wages without due process.

Svet then signs another order of garnishment on April 20, 1999 against Morales and Payne for $1,793.56 for which there is no legal cause of action.

April 27, 1999 Morales and Payne request for Writ of Prohibition from Supreme court judge Antonin Scalia to enjoin Svet from the garnishment.

Sandia employee Richard Gallegos requests documents about himself from the Phoenix EEOC office.

Gallegos discovers that EEOC Phoenix gave him the documents personally identifying Payne originally requested by EEOC Albuquerque and that Sandia denied existed. These are posted on internet atury trial: http://www.prosefights.org/nmlegal/supremecourt/cvpa.htm#gallegos.

Payne files federal lawsuit pro se under the Privacy Act to recover for damages illegal and criminal distribution of false documents.

Kriehbel, Bannerman, and Horn as hired by Sandia. Lawyer Carol Lisa Smith and Bannerman are the two lead lawyers.

Magistrate Lorenzo Garcia is assigned judge and Don Svet magistrate.

Chief magistrate William Deaton relieves Svet and assigns Las Cruces magistrate judge Karen Molzen.

In a scheduling hearing on Monday August 30, 1999 held by conference call Molzen explains in detail to lawyer Smith, with Payne listening, that Payne has an excellent state libel cause of action!

Molzen said she tape recorded the meeting.

Gacia dismisses Payne's federal lawsuit and sanctions him $912.50. Smith then files lien on Payne home $912.50 plus interest.

Payne files appeal with Tenth Circuit which is denied on December 20, 2000.

Morales and Payne realize they now have three prima facie state cases backed up by irrefutable evidence in writing.

1 Repliven [get illegally taken money back] for the $625.
2 Harassment [a New Mexico misdemeanor] for the $1,793.56.
3 Defamation and libel [both civil and criminal penalties apply] for unauthorized maintenance of a undeclared system of records and distribution of documents seen at http://www.prosefights.org/nmlegal/supremecourt/cvpa.htm#gallegos.

One and two are joint Morales and Payne actions. Three is Payne alone.

And those involved are guilty of violation of New Mexico criminal laws not just civil violations.

So Morales and Payne jointly sue former Assistant US Attorney Robert J Gorence, former US Attorney John J Kelly, Assistant US Attorney Manuel Lucero, Assistant US Attorney Jan Elizabeth Mitchell, and Federal magistrate judge Don F Svet for harassment and replevin [get the money back] in state court with a paid-for trial by jury on October 20, 2000.

Lucero, Mitchell and Svet were involved in NSA lawsuit and the taking of the $625. Kelly and Gorence for send the FBI over to Payne's house twice, once in at attempt to harass him with a letter written by Gorence.

Gorence is the former son-in-law of Pete Dominici.

State judge W Daniel Schneider is assigned judge.

Defendants hire Rodey, Dickason, Sloan, Akin & Robb to defend them.

The federal government removes this case to federal court on November 9, 2000 despite plaintiffs' arguments that replevin and harassment are not federal issues.

The case is first assigned to magistrate Lorenzo Garcia, then federal judge Martha Vazquez.

Vazquez issues ORDER

12/21/00 12/21/00 19 ORDER by District Judge Martha Vazquez granting motion for stay [10-1] , Case stayed until the outcome of the New Mexico hearing is determined re [19-2] (cc: all counsel) (msm) (29k)

No state hearing is ever held.

New Mexico federal chief judge James Parker signs

03/27/01 03/28/01 42 ORDER by Chief Judge James A. Parker that this case has been reassigned to Judge William F. Downes (cc: all counsel by dm) (sl) (22k)

In a separate action Payne sues Sandia Corporation - Sandia National Laboratories, American Telephone and Telegraph Corporation, Lockheed Martin Corporation, Krehbiel, Bannerman & Horn, John A. Bannerman, Charles Burtner, Lorenzo F. Garcia, Michael G. Robles, Carol Lisa Smith for Defamation and harassment also on October 20, 2000.

State judge Ted Baca is assigned judge.

The federal government removes can to federal court on December 6, 2000. Vazquez is assigned judge with Svet as magistrate.

Payne objects that defamation [libel] and harassment are not federal questions.

New Mexico chief federal judge James Parker signs

03/27/01 03/29/01 69 ORDER by Chief Judge James A. Parker recusing all judicial officers of the District of NM and reassigning case to Chief U.S. District Judge William F. Downes of District of Wyoming (cc: all counsel) (bap) (24k)

As a result of not allowing two New Mexico state paid for jury trial lawsuits to be heard, Morales and Payne sue those involved because of nonresponse of court; state judge Theodore C. Baca, US Attorney Norman C. Bay, Assistant US Attorney Phyllis A. Dow, Assistant US Attorney Raymond Hamilton, Rodey, Dickason, Sloan , Akin & Robb PA, and federal judge Martha Vazquez in New Mexico state court with paid for trial by jury.

French and Associates are hired to represent New Mexico state judge Ted Baca.

Ted Baca through French and Associates pay $150 filing fee to have lawsuit removed to federal court.

Parker signs

06/12/01 06/12/01 16 ORDER by Chief Judge James A. Parker recusing all judicial officers of the District of New Mexico; and reassigning this case to the Hon. William F. Downes, Chief U.S. District Judge District of Wyoming (cc: all counsel*) (sl) (8k)

Judge Downes begins to rule even though he has no jurisdiction and refuses to offer affidavit that he has jurisdiction in both the Morales and Payne and Payne federal case..

So Payne and Morales sue Assistant US Attorney John J Zavits, Wyoming chief federal judge William F. Downes, French & Associates PC and Payne sues Assistant US Attorney Phyllis A. Dow, William F. Downes, Rodey, Dickason, Sloan , Akin & Robb PA in state court for relief of a conspiracy of harassment with a paid for jury trial lawsuit.

Both cases are removed to federal court.

Parker signs

ORDER OF RECUSAL by Chief Judge James A. Parker reassigning case to Chief Judge Dee V. Benson for the District of Utah (cc: all counsel*) (bap) (8k)

for both cases.

Benson has not yet ruled.

Pattern of removal to federal court of there is just one federal defendant must be broken. So Payne sues New Mexico judge Brennan and Schneider in state court for breach of contract for not having received the trail by jury guaranteed by both state and federal constitutions and paid for.

New Mexico state law dictates that once any member of state court district is sued, all judicial officials are automatically recused and the case is referred to New Mexico supreme court for judge assignment.

New Mexico chief judge Patricio Serna assigned both the original Morales and Payne state lawsuit and Payne's lawsuit to judge Kenneth Brown of the 13th district in Bernalillo.

Walz and Associates were hired presumably by the state of New Mexico to represent Brennan and Schneider. But this is not clear. Breach of contract is not a tort and New Mexico should only pay for tort claims against its employees.

So who is paying Walz is unclear at this moment.

Morales and Payne complain to the Albuquerque Better Business Bureau on December 2, 2001 that they have been defrauded out of $916 they paid for jury trials and are guaranteed by both the US and New Mexico constitutions but have not received.

Better Business Bureau president Jerry Shipman writes in his January 28, 2002 letter that the BBB can't help us but suggests that the New Mexico Attorney General should be contacted.

On April 15, 2002 Morales and Payne contact New Mexico attorney general Patricia Madrid.

Madrid has not yet answered our letters.

Judge Brown scheduled a hearing on scheduled to hear Walz's motion to dismiss and prevent Payne from filing lawsuits pro se.

New Mexico law only permits a plaintiff to move to dismiss for a paid for trial by jury.

Brown and Walz were advised to cancel illegal hearing. When they did not, Morales and Payne sued New Mexico state judge W John Brennan, and Kenneth G Brown, New Mexico risk management employee William Haas, New Mexico supreme court chief judge Patricio M Serna, Walz and Associates were sued two days before the illegal hearing for Breach of Contract and harassment.

Haas was using New Mexico state money to harass and deny justice to Morales and Payne

New Mexico state judge Robert H. Scott is assigned judge.

Walz and Associates, by New Mexico rules, is not permitted to represent itself pro se by second judicial rules.

And Scott was automatically recused on May 10, 2002 but New Mexico court rules. But this is not stop defendant Walz from submitting a motion to dismiss and a motion to prevent Morales from representing himself pro se.

Order were submitted by Walz signed by Scott on July 28, 2002 when both Morales and Payne were unavailable and had notified all about unavailability.

When Good News process servers Susan Salinas and Sharon Apodoca attempted to serve judge Brown on Tuesday May 14, 2002 10:41 he threatened them with arrest if he was served. An affidavit to these threats has been recorded.

Payne tried to file a notice of appeal from Walz and Brown' two orders. But judge and defendant Brennan would not allow it to be filed.

So Payne filed and paid for an appeal with New Mexico appellate chief judge Richard Bossom on June 7, 2002 by certified return requested mail. The appeal was docketed.

Morales and Payne filed and paid for an Appeal from the Walz/Scott ORDERS on August 22, 2002 by certified return requested mail.

Walz and Brown's ORDER stating that Payne's litigation was "vexatious" in his attempt to recover damages for the false, defaming, and libelous documents seen at http://www.prosefights.org/nmlegal/supremecourt/cvpa.htm#gallegos. is clearly a lie.

Therefore Payne filed a criminal complaint affidavit against Walz and Brown with judge Bossom on August 22, 2002 for a prima facie case of felony perjury. All of the evidence of guilt is in writing.

John Young webmaster of Cryptome [http://cryptome.org/] insisted that we start a website about what were are doing to stop abuse of our legal system by lawyers by posting

13 November 1998

William Payne promises that he and Arthur Morales will shortly have a Web site for offering information on their activities and those of others. A URL for that site will be available soon.

This website is titled Pro se fights. It is located at http://www.prosefights.org/

Morales and Payne because of many reasons, most of which is that all of the evidence of lawyer and judicial misconduct is in writing, decided to fight the legal system.

How this all will turn out is uncertain.

But the legal profession, not Morales and Payne, cause escalation to 13 lawsuits.

Finally our nation urgently beefs up our national security to protect our borders our cities and our people.

However history shows us that great societies have not so much failed from attacks from outside but by self-destruction of corruption from within.

Can we stop history from repeating itself? We need your help.

Arthur R Morales
William H Payne

A journey of two pro se litigants (citizens acting as their own attorney) into legal system seeking justice.

What is the old saying, 'power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely'. This has become more evident with ENRON and many other big business scandals. This is not a new or uncommon thing; that is why we have an old saying. However, the big difference today is wrongdoing is not only acceptable but is in vogue.

Crooked officials stay in office and even get re-elected. Other people are appointed long term or obtain positions with no accountability. Some are even protected by 'absolute immunity'. That sounds like absolute power to me. There are powerful groups that fit in this category, such as upper management in big business and the legal system. These exclusive societies are able to deceive and take advantage for their own personal grain. The people in these societies are also able to protect each other by means of 'professional courtesy.

The problem with the legal system is that the goals of truth and justice are too often replace with gamesmanship, status, control and power. When you can add to that no accountability, absolute immunity and professional courtesy, then disaster is eminent. Then don't have to obey their own rules or even the laws of the land. That is what has happened in our case that we share with you below.

They can get away with this because in most cases few people know what's going on. When it becomes know to people capable resolving the situation, they hesitate or stop because of personal risk of confronting this powerful group. We know, for we have confronted them and have felt the effects of their misuse of power.

What has allow us to survived to date, as pro se litigants, is studying the law, doing what right to the best of our ability and the internet.

In an instant you can let the whole world know what is happening. One needs to be careful about the misinformation on the Internet. That is why our testimony is well document, backed up the law citations and through sworn testimony. Here is our short synopsis.

Our History:

Finally our nation urgently beefs up our national security to protect our borders our cities and our people. However history shows us that great societies have not so much failed from attacks from outside but by self-destruction of corruption from within.

Can we stop history from repeating itself? We need your help.

Thursday November 8, 2007 13:03

http://www.prosefights.org/nmlegal/trib/trib.html#scottoline

We got a response from author/Philadephia lawyer Scottoline.

Scottoline was born in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, and graduated magna cum laude from the University of Pennsylvania, earning a degree in English. In 1981, she graduated from the University of Pennsylvania Law School cum laude. She became a litigator at a prestigious law firm in Philadelphia but stayed home after the birth of her daughter.

There may be some good additional money here. Especially a Farsi translation.

Ms Scottoline

We listened to Killer Smile returning from pheasant hunting in Kansas on November 6, 2007.

Here's a link to 2006 hunt trip.

I'm going to focus 2007 Kansas hunt page on energy issues.

Your comments on book writing and promotion at the end disc 5 interested me.

Mr Morales and I are thinking of doing a book on our 15 year legal fight. So far. We will update Crisis in our legal system for a book prospectus

Here's part of the story.

We are now in the "move to void judgment for lack of jurisdiction" phase of our legal project.

I've written three technical books but never a book directed to the public. Here are links to two my highly technical and practical books.

Machine Assembly and Systems Programming for the IBM 360.

Embedded Controller Forth for the 8051 family microcontrollers.

Any suggestions or help would be appreciated.

Thanks in advance.

bill and art

Shirin Neshat, Vakili Rad, Hendi, Sarhadi.

We are anxious to exit this group. With our money, of course.

Nojeh uprising.

The money was managed personally by Bakhtiar and no one else.

General Ayat Mohagheghi

Utube

About Gabreski? We're thinking.

And will respond with criminal complaint affidavits naming Gabreski, Feehan, and Taylor.

Gabreski's resume looks to be a joke. Gabreski and the AF both look to be incompetents.

Few would be stupid enough to ignore a genocide criminal complaint affidavit submitted by Morales, Payne and our Persian friends. Baring Gabreski, of course.

Lieutenant General Terry Walter Gabreski

EDUCATION

1973 Bachelor of Arts degree in history, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge
1977 Squadron Officer School, Maxwell AFB, Ala.
1978 Master's degree in public administration, Golden Gate University
1985 U.S. Army Command and General Staff College, Fort Leavenworth, Kan.
1991 Air War College, Maxwell AFB, Ala.
1993 Massachusetts Institute of Technology Fellow, Washington, D.C.
1994 Executive Program for Senior Officials in National Security, John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, Cambridge, Mass.
1997 Defense Systems Management College, Fort Belvoir, Va.
2002 The General Manager Program, Harvard Business School, Cambridge, Mass.

Hahahaha.

We think that you have messed with wrong cats and should get matters settled. Before matters get far worse,

November 12-13, 2007 between Albuquerque and Monterey Payne listened to

Payne enjoyed the Camel Club by David Baldacci so the above was selected.

Baldacci apparently has a law degree ... presumably following a liberal arts degree.

Mystery above is based on public key cryptography! Another coincidence, of course.

And my Sandia labs job assignment tutorial on RSA encryption [paper1]was not sent to Japan as claimed Sandia labs.

Here's a copy of the second referenced "sensitive information" paper [paper 2].

Baldacci emphasizes how difficult public key to break because it is hard to factor... and the damage that would be caused if it were broken.

A liberal arts lawyer opinion?

Factoring may not be the only way to break publick key?

How to break public key without factoring? I have an idea. You get to select the message or MESSAGES to encrypt. So encrypt as many messages m0, m1, m2, m3 , .... as there are bits in the binary representation of the decryption exponent ... or maybe a few more. A few more won't hurt because the coefficents will be zero. Maybe a set of simultaneous equations can be constructed to solve for the values of the decryption bits? Care, of course, should be taken to chose the most advantageous messages for solution of the simultaneous equations. I, of course, don't know for sure. But this is just a thought. Monday October 8, 2007 17:51

Needles CA Monday afternoon November 12, 2007

Results of essential non-gas-wasting trip for legal advice and fun too.

Budget car rented was Pontiac G6 V6 driven 2,236 miles for total cost of $148.38

Gas more expensive than motels and food.

On the 427 and 440 legs of the trip thelow fuel warning light went on.

Payne was really worried about making it to Albuquerque. No worry, however, .365 gallons of gas remained.

Lewis and Payne discussed the merits of book writing and other things in getting these matters settled on Tuesday and Wednesday evenings.

We're still thinking on how to get these unfortunate matters settled before they get worse.

Lewis thinks Payne needs to do a FOIA/PA lawsuit to get the documents from Gosler/Sandia/judge Conway/DOE/FBI/ DOJ (motor mouth Kovakas)/ NSA/NARA.

Overview of the Privacy Act of 1974, May 2004

RICHARD G. CONVERTINO, 420 7TH Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20004 Plaintiff

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA Teresa C. Chambers Post Office Box 857 Huntingtown, MD. 20639 Plaintiff

EPIC v. DOJ: Court Rejects Secrecy Claims in FOIA Case.

----- Original Message -----
From: amorales58@comcast.net
To: bill payne
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2007 5:47 PM
Subject: FW: DOD March • Colorado Judge Misuses Court To Muzzle Reports of HOA Property Theft
Bill,
you may have seen this already but it looks like people are fighting back against dishonest judges and especially those that do not obey the US Constitution.

The timing is ripe and right.